Corticosteroids versus intravenous immune globulin for the treatment of acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective To compare the effectiveness of corticosteroids with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for the initial treatment of children with acute immune thromboevtopenic purpura (ITP). Study design A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing corticosteroids with IVIG. Studies were identified from eight electronic databases, meeting abstracts, expert consultation, and hand-searched reference lists. Two authors independently reviewed potentially eligible studies and extracted data. The number of patients with a platelet count >20,000/mm(3), 48 hours after treatment initiation, was the primary outcome. Relative risks (RR) and risk differences were pooled using a random effects model, and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. Results A total of 1248 abstracts were reviewed, 55 articles were retrieved, and 10 studies were included. The RR (steroids vs IVIG) of achieving a platelet count >20,000/mm(3) at 48 hours was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.85), and the NNT was 4.55 (95% CI: 3.23, 7.69). Conclusion Children treated with corticosteroids for acute ITP are 26% less likely to have a platelet count >20,000/mm(3) after 48 hours of therapy, when compared with children treated with IVIG. Given the importance of low platelets in the pathogenesis of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), this difference may hold important clinical implications.