Detecting Individual Differences in Change: Methods and Comparisons

被引:24
作者
Ke, Zijun [1 ]
Wang, Lijuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
variance tests; nonnormality; constrained vs. unconstrained estimation; specific vs. generalized tests; growth curve modeling; MODELS; CURVE; POWER; SIMULATION; DESIGN; TESTS;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2014.936096
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This study examined and compared various statistical methods for detecting individual differences in change. Considering 3 issues including test forms (specific vs. generalized), estimation procedures (constrained vs. unconstrained), and nonnormality, we evaluated 4 variance tests including the specific Wald variance test, the generalized Wald variance test, the specific likelihood ratio (LR) variance test, and the generalized LR variance test under both constrained and unconstrained estimation for both normal and nonnormal data. For the constrained estimation procedure, both the mixture distribution approach and the alpha correction approach were evaluated for their performance in dealing with the boundary problem. To deal with the nonnormality issue, we used the sandwich standard error (SE) estimator for the Wald tests and the Satorra-Bentler scaling correction for the LR tests. Simulation results revealed that testing a variance parameter and the associated covariances (generalized) had higher power than testing the variance solely (specific), unless the true covariances were zero. In addition, the variance tests under constrained estimation outperformed those under unconstrained estimation in terms of higher empirical power and better control of Type I error rates. Among all the studied tests, for both normal and nonnormal data, the robust generalized LR and Wald variance tests with the constrained estimation procedure were generally more powerful and had better Type I error rates for testing variance components than the other tests. Results from the comparisons between specific and generalized variance tests and between constrained and unconstrained estimation were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 400
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Handbook of structural equation modeling
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[3]  
Baltes P.B., 1979, Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development, P1
[4]   Evaluating Individual Differences in Psychological Processes [J].
Bauer, Daniel J. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (02) :115-118
[5]   Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models [J].
Bauer, DJ .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2003, 28 (02) :135-167
[6]   Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics [J].
Bentler, PM ;
Yuan, KH .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1999, 34 (02) :181-197
[7]   ROBUSTNESS [J].
BRADLEY, JV .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 31 (NOV) :144-152
[8]  
Chalmers RP, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1
[9]  
Fitzmaurice G., 2011, Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis, V2nd
[10]  
Gibbons R. D., 2003, APPL LONGITUDINAL DA