Split-dose bowel preparation improves adequacy of bowel preparation and gastroenterologists' adherence to National Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Guidelines

被引:6
作者
Menees, Stacy Bartnik [1 ,2 ]
Kim, H. Myra [3 ,4 ]
Schoenfeld, Philip [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] Ann Arbor Vet Adm Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Ctr Stat Consultat & Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[5] John D Dingell VA Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Average-risk; COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION QUALITY; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; IMPACT; RECOMMENDATIONS; POLYPECTOMY; RISK;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v24.i6.716
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM to quantify the impact of split-dose regimen on endoscopists' compliance with guideline recommendations for timing of repeat colonoscopy in patients with normal colonoscopy or 1-2 small polyps (< 10 mm). METHODS A retrospective chart review of all endoscopy reports was undertaken in average-risk individuals > 50 years old with a normal screening colonoscopy and 1-2 small polyps. Data were abstracted from two time periods, pre and post-split-dose bowel preparation institution. Main outcome measurements were recommendation for timing of repeat colonoscopy and bowel prepa-ration quality. Bivariate analysis by. 2 tests and Student's t-tests were performed to assess differences between the two cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was used with guideline consistent recommendations as the dependent variables and an indicator for 2011 cohort as the primary predictor. RESULTS Four thousand two hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the study; 47.0% (1987) prior to the institution of split dose bowel preparation, and 53.0% (2238) after the institution of split dose bowel preparation. Overall, 82.2% (n = 3472) of the colonoscopies were compliant with guideline recommendations, with a small but significantly increased compliance rate in year 2011 (83.7%) compared to year 2009 (80.4%, P = 0.005), corresponding to an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.07-1.47; P = 0.005). Colonoscopies with either "Adequate" or "Excellent" had increased from 30.6% in year 2009 to 39.6% in year 2011 (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in poor/inadequate category of bowel preparation as there was a mild increase from 4.6% in year 2009 to 5.1% in year 2011 (P = 0.50). CONCLUSION Split-dose bowel regimen increases endoscopists' compliance to guidelines in average-risk patients with normal colonoscopy or 1-2 small polyps.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 724
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Acceptance of Split-dose Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy by Patients and Providers
    Altawil, Johnny
    Miller, Lawrence A.
    Antaki, Fadi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 48 (06) : E47 - E49
  • [2] Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
  • [3] Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies
    Bucci, Cristina
    Rotondano, Gianluca
    Hassan, Cesare
    Rea, Matilde
    Bianco, Maria Antonia
    Cipolletta, Livio
    Ciacci, Carolina
    Marmo, Riccardo
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 80 (04) : 566 - +
  • [4] Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection
    Buchner, Anna M.
    Shahid, Muhammad W.
    Heckman, Michael G.
    Diehl, Nancy N.
    McNeil, Rebecca B.
    Cleveland, Patrick
    Gill, Kanwar R.
    Schore, Anthony
    Ghabril, Marwan
    Raimondo, Massimo
    Gross, Seth A.
    Wallace, Michael B.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (06) : 1223 - 1231
  • [5] Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study
    Froehlich, F
    Wietlisbach, V
    Gonvers, JJ
    Burnand, B
    Vader, JP
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) : 378 - 384
  • [6] Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia
    Harewood, GC
    Sharma, VK
    de Garmo, P
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) : 76 - 79
  • [7] Optimizing Adequacy of Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
    Johnson, David A.
    Barkun, Alan N.
    Cohen, Larry B.
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    Kaltenbach, Tonya
    Martel, Myriam
    Robertson, Douglas J.
    Boland, C. Richard
    Giardello, Frances M.
    Lieberman, David A.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 147 (04) : 903 - 924
  • [8] Timing of repeat Colonoscopy - Disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation
    Krist, Alex H.
    Jones, Resa M.
    Woolf, Steven H.
    Woessner, Sarah E.
    Merenstein, Daniel
    Kerns, J. William
    Foliaco, Walter
    Jackson, Paul
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 33 (06) : 471 - 478
  • [9] The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research
    Lai, Edwin J.
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Fix, Oren K.
    Jacobson, Brian C.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (03) : 620 - 625
  • [10] Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Larsson, SC
    Orsini, N
    Wolk, A
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (22): : 1679 - 1687