Managing tensions in sustainable development in Chinese and New Zealand business partnerships: Integrative approaches

被引:8
作者
Chen, Sitong [1 ]
Eweje, Gabriel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Business Sch, Dept Mkt, Sir Owen G Glenn Bldg Room 403,12 Grafton Rd, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Massey Univ, Sch Management, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
ambidexterity; business partnerships; China; New Zealand; paradox; stakeholder engagement; sustainability; tensions; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; TRADE-OFFS; PARADOX; AMBIDEXTERITY; MANAGEMENT; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; PERSPECTIVE; RESPONSES; BOTTOM;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3044
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Existing research posits that there are tensions in addressing divergent sustainability issues which need to be managed and embraced by firms. However, if these tensions cannot be addressed adequately, it will not only have negative impacts on individuals' interests but also on the development of organisations and ultimately the prosperity of the society, ultimately resulting in unethical consequences. Hence, this paper empirically examines tensions in addressing divergent sustainability issues and how to manage them between Chinese and New Zealand firms in business partnerships. Guided by an interpretivist philosophy, this research adopts a qualitative and abductive approach as the preferred research method. In doing so, 33 in-depth individual interviews alongside one informal group discussion were carried out at 16 relatively large Chinese and New Zealand firms known for their commitment to sustainability that are in business partnerships. Interestingly, we find that these companies are faced with complex and multiple sustainability tensions. In order to better manage these tensions, we found that these firms adopt integrative approaches with opening, surfacing, collaborative and synergistic strategies which can help these companies to enhance their organisational ambidexterity.
引用
收藏
页码:2568 / 2587
页数:20
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (01) :104-122
[2]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[3]   A Sensemaking Approach to Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Human and Ecological Elements of Corporate Sustainability [J].
Angus-Leppan, Tamsin ;
Benn, Suzanne ;
Young, Louise .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (04) :230-244
[4]   Functions of Dysfunction: Managing the Dynamics of an Organizational Duality in a Natural Food Cooperative [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Reingen, Peter H. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2014, 59 (03) :474-516
[5]   The corporate challenges of sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2002, 16 (02) :122-131
[6]   Business sustainability: It is about time [J].
Bansal, Pratima ;
DesJardine, Mark .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2014, 12 (01) :70-78
[7]   THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BARBIER, EB .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1987, 14 (02) :101-110
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[9]   Resolving the base of the pyramid inclusion paradox through supplier development [J].
Brix-Asala, Carolin ;
Seuring, Stefan ;
Sauer, Philipp C. ;
Zehendner, Axel ;
Schilling, Lara .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (07) :3208-3227
[10]  
Bryman A., 2003, BUSINESS RES METHODS