Artificial Intelligence in Enforcement: Epistemological Analysis

被引:2
作者
Ovchinnikov, Alexey I. [1 ,2 ]
Mamychev, Alexey Yu. [3 ]
Yatsenko, Tatiana S. [4 ]
Kravchenko, Artur [5 ]
Kolesnikov, Yuri A. [6 ]
机构
[1] South Fed Univ, Dept Theory & Hist State & Law, Rostov Na Donu, Russia
[2] Russian Presidential Acad Natl Econ & Publ Adm, Dept Constitut & Municipal Law, Moscow, Russia
[3] Vladivostok State Univ Econ & Serv, Dept Theory & Hist Russian & Foreign Law, Vladivostok, Russia
[4] Southern Fed Univ, Civil Law Dept, Rostov Na Donu, Russia
[5] Far Eastern Fed Univ, Dept Civil Law Disciplines, Vladivostok, Russia
[6] Southern Fed Univ, Financial Law Dept, Rostov Na Donu, Russia
关键词
artificial intelligence; law; law enforcement; justice; digitalization;
D O I
10.5539/jpl.v13n2p75
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The presented study examines the epistemological and philosophical and legal problems of the introduction of artificial intelligence systems in law enforcement. The article discusses the problematic implementation and use of artificial intelligence to automate the enforcement process, the judiciary and public administration. It is shown that the latter is considered without taking into account a key factor - the specifics of the intellectual process of bringing the general norm to a particular case. The authors show that for artificial intelligence systems, the contextuality of the principles of law is not achievable, while it is extremely necessary in law enforcement. In Al, contextual intellectual procedures cannot be programmed, since the ratio between the norm and the context of its interpretation involves a break through the hermeneutic circle in which the norm is a part and the context of the norm (industry principles) is a whole. The limited possibilities of using artificial intelligence systems in justice are also discussed, it is proved that digitalization in this area will be only instrumental in nature, and the administrative functions of robotic technologies are quite problematic and generally ineffective in the spiritual, moral and ethical dimension.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 81
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alekseev S. S., 1973, PROBLEMS THEORY LAW, V2
[2]  
ALEXY Robert., 2003, A Structual Comparasion in Ratio Juris, v, V16, n, P433, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.0952-1917.2003.00244.X
[3]  
Beketov A., 2019, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE
[4]  
Cherdantsev A.F., 1979, INTERPRETATION SOVIE
[5]  
Cherdantsev A. F., 2012, LOGICAL LINGUISTIC P
[6]  
Chernilovsky Z. M., 1989, INTRO BARTOSHEK, P5
[7]  
Fominskaya M. D., 2019, B LAW FACULTY SO FED, P8
[8]  
IVIN AA, 1987, QUESTIONS PHILOS, P31
[9]  
Kant I, 1966, WORKS, V6
[10]  
Klimenko A. I., 2019, LAW ORD ITS I FDN P, P11