Risk Factors for Persistent Anal Incontinence After Restorative Proctectomy in Rectal Cancer Patients with Anal Incontinence: Prospective Cohort Study

被引:5
作者
Lee, Taek-Gu [1 ]
Kang, Sung-Bum [1 ]
Heo, Seung Chul [2 ,3 ]
Jeong, Seung-Yong [2 ]
Park, Kyu Joo [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Songnam 463707, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Boramae Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMBINED-MODALITY THERAPY; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; SPHINCTER PRESERVATION; MESORECTAL EXCISION; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ANASTOMOSIS; CARCINOMA; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-011-1116-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study evaluated the notion that preoperative anal incontinence might be a potent predictive factor for anal incontinence (AI) after restorative proctectomy in rectal cancer patients. The principal objective of this study was to determine the risk factors for persistent anal incontinence following restorative proctectomy. Methods This study was designed as a single-center, prospective cohort study of a single group of 93 patients who had AI before restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. The study group was re-evaluated for the presence of AI 12 months after restorative proctectomy or ileostomy takedown. Incontinence severity was determined using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathologic factors associated with persistent AI. Results Fifteen patients were excluded from analysis due to death within the 12 months after surgery (n = 7), no ileostomy repair (n = 5), loss to follow-up (n = 2), or previous treatment for anal incontinence (n = 1). At 12 months, 53 of 78 patients (67.9%) had persistent AI and 25 patients (32.1 %) had recovered. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative FISI scores higher than 30 (OR = 11.61, 95% CI 1.43-94.01, p = 0.022) and lower tumor location 5 cm or less from the anal verge (OR = 84.46, 95% CI 3.91-1822.85, p = 0.005) were independent factors for persistent AI. Conclusions Anal incontinence may persist after restorative proctectomy in rectal cancer patients with high preoperative incontinence scores and lower tumor location. Therefore, this information should be provided when restorative proctectomy is offered for rectal cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1918 / 1924
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer [J].
Bretagnol, F ;
Rullier, E ;
Laurent, C ;
Zerbib, F ;
Gontier, R ;
Saric, J .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (06) :832-838
[2]   A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer [J].
Cornish, Julie A. ;
Tilney, Henry S. ;
Heriot, Alexander G. ;
Lavery, Ian C. ;
Fazio, Victor W. ;
Tekkis, Paris P. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) :2056-2068
[3]   Quality of life in rectal cancer patients -: A four-year prospective study [J].
Engel, J ;
Kerr, J ;
Schlesinger-Raab, A ;
Eckel, R ;
Sauer, H ;
Hölzel, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (02) :203-213
[4]   A Randomized Multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers [J].
Fazio, Victor W. ;
Zutshi, Massarat ;
Remzi, Feza H. ;
Parc, Yann ;
Ruppert, Reinhard ;
Ffirst, Alois ;
Celebrezze, James, Jr. ;
Galanduik, Susan ;
Orangio, Guy ;
Hyman, Neil ;
Bokey, Leslie ;
Tiret, Emmanuel ;
Kirchdorfer, Boris ;
Medich, David ;
Tietze, Marcus ;
Hull, Tracy ;
Hammel, Jeff .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (03) :481-490
[5]   A prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy - Implications for sphincter preservation [J].
Guillem, Jose G. ;
Chessin, David B. ;
Shia, Jinru ;
Suriawinata, Arief ;
Riedel, Elyn ;
Moore, Harvey G. ;
Minsky, Bruce D. ;
Wong, W. Douglas .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (01) :88-93
[6]   Analysis of Clinical Factors Associated with Anal Function after Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer [J].
Ito, Masaaki ;
Saito, Norio ;
Sugito, Masanori ;
Kobayashi, Akihiro ;
Nishizawa, Yusuke ;
Tsunoda, Yoshiyuki .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (01) :64-70
[7]   Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial [J].
Kang, Sung-Bum ;
Park, Ji Won ;
Jeong, Seung-Yong ;
Nam, Byung Ho ;
Choi, Hyo Seong ;
Kim, Duck-Woo ;
Lim, Seok-Byung ;
Lee, Taek-Gu ;
Kim, Dae Yong ;
Kim, Jae-Sung ;
Chang, Hee Jin ;
Lee, Hye-Seung ;
Kim, Sun Young ;
Jung, Kyung Hae ;
Hong, Yong Sang ;
Kim, Jee Hyun ;
Sohn, Dae Kyung ;
Kim, Dae-Hyun ;
Oh, Jae Hwan .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (07) :637-645
[8]   Risk factors for faecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment [J].
Lange, M. M. ;
den Dulk, M. ;
Bossema, E. R. ;
Maas, C. P. ;
Peeters, K. C. M. J. ;
Rutten, H. J. ;
Kranenbarg, E. Klein ;
Marijnen, C. A. M. ;
de Velde, C. J. H. van .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (10) :1278-1284
[9]   Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer:: A prospective, randomized study comparing handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis [J].
Laurent, A ;
Parc, Y ;
McNamara, D ;
Parc, R ;
Tiret, E .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (04) :729-734
[10]   WHY DO SOME PATIENTS EXPERIENCE POOR FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER ANTERIOR RESECTION OF THE RECTUM FOR CARCINOMA [J].
LEWIS, WG ;
MARTIN, IG ;
WILLIAMSON, MER ;
STEPHENSON, BM ;
HOLDSWORTH, PJ ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (03) :259-263