Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems

被引:6
作者
Qin, Hua [1 ]
Meng, Tuanxing [1 ]
Cao, Yuyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Coll Comp & Elect Informat Engn, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multimodal optimization problems; grey wolf optimizer; fuzzy search direction; fuzzy crossover operator; binary joint normal distribution; SEARCH ALGORITHM; FLIGHT;
D O I
10.3390/s22176420
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Traditional grey wolf optimizers (GWOs) have difficulty balancing convergence and diversity when used for multimodal optimization problems (MMOPs), resulting in low-quality solutions and slow convergence. To address these drawbacks of GWOs, a fuzzy strategy grey wolf optimizer (FSGWO) is proposed in this paper. Binary joint normal distribution is used as a fuzzy method to realize the adaptive adjustment of the control parameters of the FSGWO. Next, the fuzzy mutation operator and the fuzzy crossover operator are designed to generate new individuals based on the fuzzy control parameters. Moreover, a noninferior selection strategy is employed to update the grey wolf population, which makes the entire population available for estimating the location of the optimal solution. Finally, the FSGWO is verified on 30 test functions of IEEE CEC2014 and five engineering application problems. Comparing FSGWO with state-of-the-art competitive algorithms, the results show that FSGWO is superior. Specifically, for the 50D test functions of CEC2014, the average calculation accuracy of FSGWO is 33.63%, 46.45%, 62.94%, 64.99%, and 59.82% higher than those of the equilibrium optimizer algorithm, modified particle swarm optimization, original GWO, hybrid particle swarm optimization and GWO, and selective opposition-based GWO, respectively. For the 30D and 50D test functions of CEC2014, the results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test show that FSGWO is better than the competitive algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   Analysis of new niching genetic algorithms for finding multiple solutions in the job shop scheduling [J].
Perez, E. ;
Posada, M. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2012, 23 (03) :341-356
[52]   Memetic algorithms outperform evolutionary algorithms in multimodal optimisation [J].
Phan Trung Hai Nguyen ;
Sudholt, Dirk .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 287
[53]   Hybridizing Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO) with Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) for text feature selection and clustering [J].
Purushothaman, R. ;
Rajagopalan, S. P. ;
Dhandapani, Gopinath .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 96
[54]   Self-Adjusting Evolutionary Algorithms for Multimodal Optimization [J].
Rajabi, Amirhossein ;
Witt, Carsten .
GECCO'20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2020, :1314-1322
[55]   Accelerated grey wolf optimization for global optimization problems [J].
Rajakumar, R. ;
Sekaran, Kaushik ;
Hsu, Ching-Hsien ;
Kadry, Seifedine .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 169
[56]   A niching chaos optimization algorithm for multimodal optimization [J].
Rim, Cholmin ;
Piao, Songhao ;
Li, Guo ;
Pak, Unsun .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (02) :621-633
[57]   Group-based synchronous-asynchronous Grey Wolf Optimizer [J].
Rodriguez, Alma ;
Camarena, Octavio ;
Cuevas, Erik ;
Aranguren, Itzel ;
Valdivia-G, Arturo ;
Morales-Castaneda, Bernardo ;
Zaldivar, Daniel ;
Perez-Cisneros, Marco .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2021, 93 :226-243
[58]   A harmonic estimator design with evolutionary operators equipped grey wolf optimizer [J].
Saxena, Akash ;
Kumar, Rajesh ;
Mirjalili, Seyedali .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 145
[59]   β-Chaotic map enabled Grey Wolf Optimizer [J].
Saxena, Akash ;
Kumar, Rajesh ;
Das, Swagatam .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 75 :84-105
[60]   Multimodal function optimization based on particle swarm optimization [J].
Seo, JH ;
Im, CH ;
Heo, CG ;
Kim, JK ;
Jung, HK ;
Lee, CG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2006, 42 (04) :1095-1098