Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers

被引:20
作者
Bar, Esther [1 ,2 ]
Volz, Lennart [3 ]
Collins-Fekete, Charles-Antoine [1 ]
Brons, Stephan [4 ]
Runz, Armin [5 ]
Schulte, Reinhard Wilhelm [6 ]
Seco, Joao [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiotherapy Phys, Radiotherapy Phys, London, England
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Biomed Phys Radiat Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, Med Phys Radiat Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Loma Linda Univ, Div Biomed Engn Sci, Loma Linda, CA USA
[7] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Heidelberg, Germany
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
dual-energy computed tomography; particle computed tomography; proton stopping power; DUAL-ENERGY CT; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; PROTON RADIOGRAPHY; SCANNER; UNCERTAINTIES; PERFORMANCE; CALIBRATION; RESOLUTION; RADIATION; RATIO;
D O I
10.1002/mp.15283
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Measurements comparing relative stopping power (RSP) accuracy of state-of-the-art systems representing single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography (SECT/DECT) with proton CT (pCT) and helium CT (HeCT) in biological tissue samples. Methods: We used 16 porcine and bovine samples of various tissue types and water, covering an RSP range from 0.90 +/- 0.06 to 1.78 +/- 0.05. Samples were packed and sealed into 3D-printed cylinders (d=2 cm, h=5 cm) and inserted into an in-house designed cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom (d=10 cm, h=10 cm). We scanned the phantom in a commercial SECT and DECT (120 kV; 100 and 140 kV/Sn (tin-filtered)); and acquired pCT and HeCT (E similar to 200 MeV/u, 2 circle steps, similar to 6.2x106 (p)/similar to 2.3x106 (He) particles/projection) with a particle imaging prototype. RSP maps were calculated from SECT/DECT using stoichiometric methods and from pCT/HeCT using the DROP-TVS algorithm. We estimated the average RSP of each tissue per modality in cylindrical volumes of interest and compared it to ground truth RSP taken from peak-detection measurements. Results: Throughout all samples, we observe the following root-mean-squared RSP prediction errors +/- combined uncertainty from reference measurement and imaging: SECT 3.10 +/- 2.88%, DECT 0.75 +/- 2.80%, pCT 1.19 +/- 2.81%, and HeCT 0.78 +/- 2.81%. The largest mean errors +/- combined uncertainty per modality are SECT 8.22 +/- 2.79% in cortical bone, DECT 1.74 +/- 2.00% in back fat, pCT 1.80 +/- 4.27% in bone marrow, and HeCT 1.37 +/- 4.25% in bone marrow. Ring artifacts were observed in both pCT and HeCT reconstructions, imposing a systematic shift to predicted RSPs. Conclusion: Comparing state-of-the-art SECT/DECT technology and a pCT/HeCT prototype, DECT provided the most accurate RSP prediction, closely followed by particle imaging. The novel modalities pCT and HeCT have the potential to further improve on RSP accuracies with work focusing on the origin and correction of ring artifacts. Future work will study accuracy of proton treatment plans using RSP maps from investigated imaging modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 487
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT [J].
Piersimoni, Pierluigi ;
Faddegon, Bruce A. ;
Mendez, Jose Ramos ;
Schulte, Reinhard W. ;
Volz, Lennart ;
Seco, Joao .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (07) :3264-3274
[32]   An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner [J].
Plautz, Tia E. ;
Bashkirov, V. ;
Giacometti, V. ;
Hurley, R. F. ;
Johnson, R. P. ;
Piersimoni, P. ;
Sadrozinski, H. F. -W. ;
Schulte, R. W. ;
Zatserklyaniy, A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (12) :6291-6300
[33]   Two-dimensional noise reconstruction in proton computed tomography using distance-driven filtered back-projection of simulated projections [J].
Raedler, Martin ;
Landry, Guillaume ;
Rit, Simon ;
Schulte, Reinhard W. ;
Parodi, Katia ;
Dedes, George .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (21)
[34]  
Rykalin V., ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
[35]   Development of a head scanner for proton CT [J].
Sadrozinski, H. F. -W. ;
Johnson, R. P. ;
Macafee, S. ;
Plumb, A. ;
Steinberg, D. ;
Zatserklyaniy, A. ;
Bashkirov, V. A. ;
Hurley, R. F. ;
Schulte, R. W. .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2013, 699 :205-210
[36]   The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power [J].
Schaffner, B ;
Pedroni, E .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (06) :1579-1592
[37]   The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Schneider, U ;
Pedroni, E ;
Lomax, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (01) :111-124
[38]  
Schubert KE., 2014, ARXIV14021720PHYSICS
[39]   Density resolution of proton computed tomography [J].
Schulte, RW ;
Bashkirov, V ;
Klock, MCL ;
Li, TF ;
Wroe, AJ ;
Evseev, I ;
Williams, DC ;
Satogata, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (04) :1035-1046
[40]  
Schultze B, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P25946, DOI [10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057760, 10.1109/access.2021.3057760]