Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers

被引:20
作者
Bar, Esther [1 ,2 ]
Volz, Lennart [3 ]
Collins-Fekete, Charles-Antoine [1 ]
Brons, Stephan [4 ]
Runz, Armin [5 ]
Schulte, Reinhard Wilhelm [6 ]
Seco, Joao [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiotherapy Phys, Radiotherapy Phys, London, England
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Biomed Phys Radiat Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, Med Phys Radiat Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Loma Linda Univ, Div Biomed Engn Sci, Loma Linda, CA USA
[7] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Heidelberg, Germany
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
dual-energy computed tomography; particle computed tomography; proton stopping power; DUAL-ENERGY CT; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; PROTON RADIOGRAPHY; SCANNER; UNCERTAINTIES; PERFORMANCE; CALIBRATION; RESOLUTION; RADIATION; RATIO;
D O I
10.1002/mp.15283
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Measurements comparing relative stopping power (RSP) accuracy of state-of-the-art systems representing single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography (SECT/DECT) with proton CT (pCT) and helium CT (HeCT) in biological tissue samples. Methods: We used 16 porcine and bovine samples of various tissue types and water, covering an RSP range from 0.90 +/- 0.06 to 1.78 +/- 0.05. Samples were packed and sealed into 3D-printed cylinders (d=2 cm, h=5 cm) and inserted into an in-house designed cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom (d=10 cm, h=10 cm). We scanned the phantom in a commercial SECT and DECT (120 kV; 100 and 140 kV/Sn (tin-filtered)); and acquired pCT and HeCT (E similar to 200 MeV/u, 2 circle steps, similar to 6.2x106 (p)/similar to 2.3x106 (He) particles/projection) with a particle imaging prototype. RSP maps were calculated from SECT/DECT using stoichiometric methods and from pCT/HeCT using the DROP-TVS algorithm. We estimated the average RSP of each tissue per modality in cylindrical volumes of interest and compared it to ground truth RSP taken from peak-detection measurements. Results: Throughout all samples, we observe the following root-mean-squared RSP prediction errors +/- combined uncertainty from reference measurement and imaging: SECT 3.10 +/- 2.88%, DECT 0.75 +/- 2.80%, pCT 1.19 +/- 2.81%, and HeCT 0.78 +/- 2.81%. The largest mean errors +/- combined uncertainty per modality are SECT 8.22 +/- 2.79% in cortical bone, DECT 1.74 +/- 2.00% in back fat, pCT 1.80 +/- 4.27% in bone marrow, and HeCT 1.37 +/- 4.25% in bone marrow. Ring artifacts were observed in both pCT and HeCT reconstructions, imposing a systematic shift to predicted RSPs. Conclusion: Comparing state-of-the-art SECT/DECT technology and a pCT/HeCT prototype, DECT provided the most accurate RSP prediction, closely followed by particle imaging. The novel modalities pCT and HeCT have the potential to further improve on RSP accuracies with work focusing on the origin and correction of ring artifacts. Future work will study accuracy of proton treatment plans using RSP maps from investigated imaging modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 487
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   A Fast Experimental Scanner for Proton CT: Technical Performance and First Experience With Phantom Scans [J].
Johnson, Robert P. ;
Bashkirov, Vladimir ;
DeWitt, Langley ;
Giacometti, Valentina ;
Hurley, Robert F. ;
Piersimoni, Pierluigi ;
Plautz, Tia E. ;
Sadrozinski, Hartmut F. -W. ;
Schubert, Keith ;
Schulte, Reinhard ;
Schultze, Blake ;
Zatserklyaniy, Andriy .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2016, 63 (01) :52-60
[22]   A Bayesian approach to solve proton stopping powers from noisy multi-energy CT data [J].
Lalonde, Arthur ;
Bar, Esther ;
Bouchard, Hugo .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (10) :5293-5302
[23]   A general method to derive tissue parameters for Monte Carlo dose calculation with multi-energy CT [J].
Lalonde, Arthur ;
Bouchard, Hugo .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (22) :8044-8069
[24]   Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients [J].
Landry, Guillaume ;
Seco, Joao ;
Gaudreault, Mathieu ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (19) :6851-6866
[25]   Deriving concentrations of oxygen and carbon in human tissues using single- and dual-energy CT for ion therapy applications [J].
Landry, Guillaume ;
Parodi, Katia ;
Wildberger, Joachim E. ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (15) :5029-5048
[26]   Reconstruction for proton computed tomography by tracing proton trajectories: A Monte Carlo study [J].
Li, TF ;
Liang, ZR ;
Singanallur, JV ;
Satogata, TJ ;
Williams, DC ;
Schulte, RW .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (03) :699-706
[27]   Experimental verification of stopping-power prediction from single- and dual-energy computed tomography in biological tissues [J].
Moehler, Christian ;
Russ, Tom ;
Wohlfahrt, Patrick ;
Elter, Alina ;
Runz, Armin ;
Richter, Christian ;
Greilich, Steffen .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (02)
[28]   Range prediction for tissue mixtures based on dual-energy CT [J].
Moehler, Christian ;
Wohlfahrt, Patrick ;
Richter, Christian ;
Greilich, Steffen .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (11) :N268-N275
[29]   Total variation superiorization schemes in proton computed tomography image reconstruction [J].
Penfold, S. N. ;
Schulte, R. W. ;
Censor, Y. ;
Rosenfeld, A. B. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (11) :5887-5895
[30]   The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy [J].
Piersimoni, P. ;
Ramos-Mendez, J. ;
Geoghegan, T. ;
Bashkirov, V. A. ;
Schulte, R. W. ;
Faddegon, B. A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (01) :284-298