Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy and Body Mass Index: Is It Really a Limiting Factor for the Procedure?

被引:2
作者
Reyes Claret, Albert [1 ]
Martinez Canto, Maria Cristina [1 ]
Robles Gourley, Ana [2 ]
Llull Gomila, Marina [1 ]
Martin Jimenez, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Son Llatzer, Gynecol Oncol Dept, Crta Manacor Km 4, Palma De Mallorca 07198, Spain
[2] Hosp Comarcal Inca, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Inca, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2020年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
transperitoneal laparoscopy; para-aortic lymphadenectomy; staging; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; VISCERAL FAT; INFRARENAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CERVICAL-CANCER; OBESE-PATIENTS; EXTRAPERITONEAL; ENDOMETRIAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2019.0529
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explore if obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m(2) represents a limiting factor for para-aortic lymphadenectomy done with a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study with 146 consecutive patients, diagnosed with a gynecological cancer submitted to para-aortic surgical staging between January 2010 and December 2018. The mean age was 52 years and the mean BMI was 27 kg/m(2). 72.6% (106 patients) had BMI <30 kg/m(2) and 27.4% (40 patients) had BMI >= 30 kg/m(2). Half of the patients did not have prior abdominal surgeries. Results: The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between two groups depending on their BMI in the lymph node count: BMI <30 kg/m(2) 14 nodes versus BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) 10 nodes (P = .122); rate of intraoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.3% versus BMI >= 30: 0% (P = .180), postoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.6% versus BMI >= 30: 5% (P = .723); feasibility rate: BMI <30: 97.1% versus BMI >= 30: 95.6% (P = .063) or the mean hospital stay BMI <30: 2.47 +/- 2.05 days (standard deviation [SD]), BMI >= 30: 2.64 +/- 0.93 days (SD) (P = .171). The only significant difference observed was due to the operating time: BMI <30: 103.1 +/- 60.8 (SD) versus BMI >= 30: 146.9 +/- 82.5 (SD) (P = .019), being longer in obese patients. Conclusions: Obesity, estimated by BMI, does not seem to represent a limiting factor for this surgical procedure in our series. We feel it is a feasible and justified approach in obese patients when other surgical procedures have to be carried out in the same surgical act. Probably, other factors and anthropometric measurements are more accurate to select patients in which this approach is feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 422
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Standardized technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer optimizes the perioperative outcomes
    Andreas Kavallaris
    Ioannis Kalogiannidis
    Nektarios Chalvatzas
    Amadeus Hornemann
    Michael K. Bohlmann
    Klaus Diedrich
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 283 : 1373 - 1380
  • [32] Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical hysterectomy in a patient with cervical cancer, six months after primary chemoradiation
    Zygouris, D.
    Kotsopoulos, I. C.
    Chalvatzas, N.
    Maltaris, T.
    Kartsiounis, V.
    Kavallaris, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 34 (05) : 484 - 486
  • [33] Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer patient with left-sided inferior vena cava
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Ryu, Hee-Sug
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 126 (01) : 147 - 148
  • [34] Left-sided laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Anatomy of the ventral tributaries of the infrarenal vena cava
    Possover, M
    Plaul, K
    Krause, N
    Schneider, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (05) : 1295 - 1297
  • [35] Surgical Outcomes of Transperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Compared With Extraperitoneal Approach in Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Kun-peng
    Deng, Xian-zhong
    Wu, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [36] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Cost Between Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopy for Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy (TIPAL)
    Coronado, Pluvio J.
    Fasero, Maria
    Magrina, Javier F.
    Herraiz, Miguel A.
    Vidart, Jose A.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 674 - 681
  • [37] Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer A Prospective Correlation of Surgical Findings With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Findings
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    Euscher, Elizabeth D.
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Ramondetta, Lois M.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (09) : 1928 - 1934
  • [38] Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy as a classification method in locally advanced cervical cancer: Report of a series of cases
    Acosta, Jesus
    Burbano, Javier
    Almeciga, Adriana
    Carlos Velasquez, Juan
    Suarez, Amaranto
    Lopez, David
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CANCEROLOGIA, 2018, 22 (03): : 119 - 125
  • [39] Role of a Double Docking to Improve Lymph Node Dissection When Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy Is Associated to a Pelvic Procedure
    Franke, Oona
    Narducci, Fabrice
    Chereau-Ewald, Elisabeth
    Orsoni, Marion
    Jauffret, Camille
    Leblanc, Eric
    Houvenaeghel, Gilles
    Lambaudie, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (02) : 331 - U155
  • [40] Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Zhu, Tao
    Chen, Xi
    Zhu, Jianqing
    Chen, Yaqing
    Yu, Aijun
    Chen, Lu
    Shou, Huafeng
    Wu, Meijuan
    Zhang, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (06) : 1211 - 1216