Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy and Body Mass Index: Is It Really a Limiting Factor for the Procedure?

被引:2
作者
Reyes Claret, Albert [1 ]
Martinez Canto, Maria Cristina [1 ]
Robles Gourley, Ana [2 ]
Llull Gomila, Marina [1 ]
Martin Jimenez, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Son Llatzer, Gynecol Oncol Dept, Crta Manacor Km 4, Palma De Mallorca 07198, Spain
[2] Hosp Comarcal Inca, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Inca, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2020年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
transperitoneal laparoscopy; para-aortic lymphadenectomy; staging; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; VISCERAL FAT; INFRARENAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CERVICAL-CANCER; OBESE-PATIENTS; EXTRAPERITONEAL; ENDOMETRIAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2019.0529
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explore if obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m(2) represents a limiting factor for para-aortic lymphadenectomy done with a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study with 146 consecutive patients, diagnosed with a gynecological cancer submitted to para-aortic surgical staging between January 2010 and December 2018. The mean age was 52 years and the mean BMI was 27 kg/m(2). 72.6% (106 patients) had BMI <30 kg/m(2) and 27.4% (40 patients) had BMI >= 30 kg/m(2). Half of the patients did not have prior abdominal surgeries. Results: The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between two groups depending on their BMI in the lymph node count: BMI <30 kg/m(2) 14 nodes versus BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) 10 nodes (P = .122); rate of intraoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.3% versus BMI >= 30: 0% (P = .180), postoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.6% versus BMI >= 30: 5% (P = .723); feasibility rate: BMI <30: 97.1% versus BMI >= 30: 95.6% (P = .063) or the mean hospital stay BMI <30: 2.47 +/- 2.05 days (standard deviation [SD]), BMI >= 30: 2.64 +/- 0.93 days (SD) (P = .171). The only significant difference observed was due to the operating time: BMI <30: 103.1 +/- 60.8 (SD) versus BMI >= 30: 146.9 +/- 82.5 (SD) (P = .019), being longer in obese patients. Conclusions: Obesity, estimated by BMI, does not seem to represent a limiting factor for this surgical procedure in our series. We feel it is a feasible and justified approach in obese patients when other surgical procedures have to be carried out in the same surgical act. Probably, other factors and anthropometric measurements are more accurate to select patients in which this approach is feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 422
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new technique of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy optimizes perioperative outcome
    Lin, Yonghong
    He, Li
    Mei, Youwen
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [22] Laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic debulking surgery in locally advanced cervical carcinoma
    Veiga, Nadia
    Narvaez, Marta
    Aguirre, Sara
    Lapena, Sonia
    Tarrio, Orencio
    Muruzabal Torquemada, Juan Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (08) : 1084 - 1085
  • [23] A New Single-Port Approach to Perform a Transperitoneal Step and an Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy with a Single Incision
    Gouy, Sebastien
    Uzan, Catherine
    Kane, Aminata
    Scherier, Stephanie
    Gauthier, Tristan
    Bentivegna, Enrica
    Morice, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 214 (05) : E25 - E30
  • [24] Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: Experience with 150 patients and review of the literature
    Possover, M
    Krause, N
    Plaul, K
    Kuhne-Heid, R
    Schneider, A
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 71 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [25] Learning curve of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: A cumulative sum analysis
    Yoshida, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Megumi
    Shigeta, Hiroyuki
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2020, 35 : 254 - 260
  • [26] Management of a postsurgical chylous ascites following a laparoscopic retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy
    Vazquez-Vicente, D.
    Navarro, B.
    Garcia, J. E.
    Fernandez, B.
    Urbano, J.
    Plaza, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 39 (01) : 151 - 153
  • [27] A propensity score evaluation of single-port or multiport extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy and the transperitoneal approach for gynecological cancers
    Naoura, Iptissem
    Laas, Enora
    Beytout, Clementine
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    Ballester, Marcos
    Darai, Emile
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2016, 103 (04) : 320 - 329
  • [28] Does ultrasonic advanced energy reduce lymphocele incidence in laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy?
    Lamblin, Gery
    Chauvy, Lauriane
    Rannou, Corinne
    Mathevet, Patrice
    Chabert, Philippe
    Mellier, Georges
    Chene, Gautier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 185 : 53 - 58
  • [29] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for lymph node recurrence of fallopian tube carcinoma
    Cordoba, O.
    Gil-Moreno, A.
    de la Torre, J.
    Martinez-Palones, J. M.
    Diaz, B.
    Xercavins, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2006, 16 (03) : 991 - 993
  • [30] Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced cervical carcinoma: The Taiwan experience. II
    Chu, KK
    Chang, SD
    Soong, YK
    GYNAECOLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 7 (04) : 183 - 186