Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy and Body Mass Index: Is It Really a Limiting Factor for the Procedure?

被引:2
作者
Reyes Claret, Albert [1 ]
Martinez Canto, Maria Cristina [1 ]
Robles Gourley, Ana [2 ]
Llull Gomila, Marina [1 ]
Martin Jimenez, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Son Llatzer, Gynecol Oncol Dept, Crta Manacor Km 4, Palma De Mallorca 07198, Spain
[2] Hosp Comarcal Inca, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Inca, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2020年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
transperitoneal laparoscopy; para-aortic lymphadenectomy; staging; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; VISCERAL FAT; INFRARENAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CERVICAL-CANCER; OBESE-PATIENTS; EXTRAPERITONEAL; ENDOMETRIAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2019.0529
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explore if obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m(2) represents a limiting factor for para-aortic lymphadenectomy done with a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study with 146 consecutive patients, diagnosed with a gynecological cancer submitted to para-aortic surgical staging between January 2010 and December 2018. The mean age was 52 years and the mean BMI was 27 kg/m(2). 72.6% (106 patients) had BMI <30 kg/m(2) and 27.4% (40 patients) had BMI >= 30 kg/m(2). Half of the patients did not have prior abdominal surgeries. Results: The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between two groups depending on their BMI in the lymph node count: BMI <30 kg/m(2) 14 nodes versus BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) 10 nodes (P = .122); rate of intraoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.3% versus BMI >= 30: 0% (P = .180), postoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.6% versus BMI >= 30: 5% (P = .723); feasibility rate: BMI <30: 97.1% versus BMI >= 30: 95.6% (P = .063) or the mean hospital stay BMI <30: 2.47 +/- 2.05 days (standard deviation [SD]), BMI >= 30: 2.64 +/- 0.93 days (SD) (P = .171). The only significant difference observed was due to the operating time: BMI <30: 103.1 +/- 60.8 (SD) versus BMI >= 30: 146.9 +/- 82.5 (SD) (P = .019), being longer in obese patients. Conclusions: Obesity, estimated by BMI, does not seem to represent a limiting factor for this surgical procedure in our series. We feel it is a feasible and justified approach in obese patients when other surgical procedures have to be carried out in the same surgical act. Probably, other factors and anthropometric measurements are more accurate to select patients in which this approach is feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 422
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma
    Fastrez, Maxime
    Vandromme, Jean
    George, Pascale
    Rozenberg, Serge
    Degueldre, Michel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 147 (02) : 226 - 229
  • [2] Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Technique and surgical outcomes
    Durda, Gulsen Dogan
    Alemdaroglu, Songul
    Baran, Safak Yilmaz
    Yaginc, Didem Alkas
    Simsek, Seda Yuksel
    Celik, Husnu
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 50 (05)
  • [3] Systemic Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy to the Left Renal Vein
    Jung, Un Suk
    Choi, Joong Sub
    Bae, Jaeman
    Lee, Won Moo
    Eom, Jeong Min
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2019, 23 (02)
  • [4] Ureter Injury in Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer by the Transperitoneal Approach
    Kobayashi, Hiroharu
    Kobayashi, Misa
    Takaki, Yoshihiro
    Kondo, Yuki
    Hamada, Yuri
    Shimizu, Haruhiko
    Shimizu, Yumi
    Nagashima, Masaru
    Adachi, Hiroshi
    CASE REPORTS IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 2023
  • [5] Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage cervical cancer: Standard procedure in 2010?
    Uzan, C.
    Gouy, S.
    Pautier, P.
    Haie-Meder, C.
    Duvillard, P.
    Narducci, F.
    Leblanc, E.
    Morice, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2010, 38 (11): : 668 - 671
  • [6] Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Combined Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approach in Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Kubo-Kaneda, Michiko
    Kondo, Eiji
    Nimura, Ryo
    Maki, Shintaro
    Nii, Masafumi
    Yoshida, Kenta
    Ikeda, Tomoaki
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (08) : 4151 - 4155
  • [7] Comparison of surgical and pathological parameters after laparoscopic transperitoneal pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomies
    Jacob, Anna
    Plaikner, Andrea
    Schneider, Achim
    Favero, Giovanni
    Tozzi, Roberto
    Mallmann, Peter
    Domroese, Christian
    Martus, Peter
    Marnitz, Simone
    Barinoff, Jana
    Kohler, Christhardt
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (11) : 1798 - 1802
  • [8] Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
    Horikawa, Naoki
    Horie, Akihito
    Kawahara, Shunsuke
    Sunada, Masumi
    Chigusa, Yoshitsugu
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Hamanishi, Junzo
    Kondo, Eiji
    Mandai, Masaki
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2022, 26 (01)
  • [9] A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma
    Pakish, Janelle
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Westin, Shannon N.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (02) : 366 - 371
  • [10] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy as a diagnostic procedure for lymph node recurrence of gynaecological cancers
    Sanjuan, A.
    Illa, M.
    Torne, A.
    Martinez Roman, S.
    Jurado, M.
    Lejarcegui, J. A.
    Pahisa, J.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (04) : 491 - 495