Economic globalization and violent civil conflict: Is openness a pathway to peace?

被引:33
作者
Blanton, Robert G. [1 ]
Apodaca, Clair [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Dept Polit Sci, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Int Relat, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.soscij.2007.10.001
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
There has been little systematic assessment of the impact of globalization on armed conflict within states. Drawing from bargaining theories of conflict, we posit that the global marketplace functions as an "audience" that rewards or punishes the policy choices of states. Globalization, which connotes an increased exposure to this marketplace, increases the relevance of the "costs" that this "audience" may impose. These prospective costs thus encourage peace and stability, as states that are integrated into the global economy have more to lose by instigating and sustaining violent conflict within their borders. Employing a two-stage Heckman Model, we assess the impact of various facets of globalization, including access to information, trade, foreign investment and aid flows, on intrastate conflict within the developing countries for 1990-1996. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 619
页数:21
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Economic integration and political disintegration [J].
Alesina, A ;
Spolaore, E ;
Wacziarg, R .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (05) :1276-1296
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, World Development Indicators Online
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FOREIGN POLICY, P52
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HAS GLOBALIZATION GO
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT REGIMES
[6]  
[Anonymous], GLOBALIZATION ARMED
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, LEXUS OLIVE TREE
[8]   Global economic patterns and personal integrity rights after the Cold War [J].
Apodaca, C .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2001, 45 (04) :587-602
[9]   Economic globalization and civil war [J].
Barbieri, K ;
Reuveny, R .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2005, 67 (04) :1228-1247
[10]   AN INTRODUCTION TO SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS IN SOCIOLOGICAL DATA [J].
BERK, RA .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1983, 48 (03) :386-398