Aluminium honeycomb sandwich as a design alternative for lightweight marine structures

被引:25
作者
Palomba, G. [1 ]
Epasto, G. [1 ]
Sutherland, L. [2 ]
Crupi, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Dept Engn, Messina, Italy
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, CENTEC, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Honeycomb structures; lightweight; material charts; failure maps; marine structures; Green design; VELOCITY IMPACT RESPONSE; PANELS; BEHAVIOR; COLLAPSE; SINGLE; SHIPS;
D O I
10.1080/17445302.2021.1996109
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Weight reduction and materials sustainability are becoming of primary importance for marine structures. A solution to both issues could lie in the application of all-metal sandwich structures. The study suggests the substitution of common marine structures with aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures (AHS), as a green and lightweight alternative, through a new methodology for structure comparison and design. Comparisons were based on bending stiffness equivalence and its relation to other design parameters, used to produce materials charts. A graphical approach based on plots of stiffness requirements, weight reduction goal and failure modes was applied for the identification of the main design variables. The feasibility and effectiveness of the developed approach was illustrated by outlining an example regarding the substitution of a GFRP-based ship balcony overhang with an equivalent AHS. The results showed the possibility to significantly reduce the weight, leave the geometry almost unchanged, and improve the mechanical response.
引用
收藏
页码:2355 / 2366
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Computed tomography analysis of impact response of lightweight sandwich panels with micro lattice core
    Abrate, S.
    Epasto, G.
    Kara, E.
    Crupi, V.
    Guglielmino, E.
    Aykul, H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2018, 232 (08) : 1348 - 1362
  • [2] Allen HG, 1969, ANAL DESIGN STRUCTUR
  • [3] Almet-marine, 2018, AL US GUID, P135
  • [4] Structural analysis and design of a car carrier with composite sandwich deck panels
    Andric, Jerolim
    Kitarovic, Stanislav
    Radolovic, Vito
    Prebeg, Pero
    [J]. SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2019, 14 (sup1) : S171 - S186
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, MOSAIC PROJECT FINAL
  • [6] Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection
    Ashby, MF
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2000, 48 (01) : 359 - 369
  • [7] HONEYCOMB MARINE APPLICATIONS
    BITZER, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES, 1994, 13 (04) : 355 - 360
  • [8] Compocel®, 2021, DAT AL FR
  • [9] A comparative method for scaling SOLAS collision damage distributions based on ship crashworthiness - application to probabilistic damage stability analysis of a passenger ship
    Conti, Fabien
    Le Sourne, Herve
    Vassalos, Dracos
    Kujala, Pentti
    Lindroth, Daniel
    Kim, Sang Jin
    Hirdaris, Spyros
    [J]. SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2022, 17 (07) : 1498 - 1514
  • [10] Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: Honeycomb vs. foam
    Crupi, V.
    Epasto, G.
    Guglielmino, E.
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2013, 30 : 74 - 96