Retention, Bacterial Adhesion, and Biofilm Formation between Anionic and Zwitterionic Bandage Contact Lenses in Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study

被引:0
作者
Kita, Mizuki [1 ]
Kanai, Kazutaka [1 ]
Ono, Hisaya K. [2 ]
Otaka, Yuya [1 ]
Okada, Daiki [1 ]
Nagai, Noriaki [3 ]
Kudo, Rina [1 ]
Yamashita, Yohei [1 ]
Hino, Shiori [4 ]
Matsunaga, Toru [4 ]
Tajima, Kazuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Sch Vet Med, Dept Small Anim Internal Med 2, 35-1 Higashi 23 Ban Cho, Towada, Aomori 0348628, Japan
[2] Kitasato Univ, Sch Vet Med, Dept Zoonoses, 35-1 Higashi 23 Ban Cho, Towada, Aomori 0348628, Japan
[3] Kindai Univ, Fac Pharm, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashiosaka, Osaka 5778502, Japan
[4] Seed Co Ltd, Bunkyo Ku, 2-40-2 Hongo, Tokyo 1138402, Japan
关键词
bacterial adhesion; bandage contact lens; biofilm formation; contact lens retention; dogs; CORNEAL EPITHELIAL DEFECTS; SURFACE-CHARGE; KERATITIS; MODEL; HYDROPHOBICITY; GROWTH; SCCEDS;
D O I
10.3390/vetsci8100238
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This study aimed to compare the in vitro and in vivo retention, bacterial adhesion, and biofilm formation between anionic and zwitterionic bandage contact lenses (BCLs) in healthy canines. BCL retention and tolerance were evaluated in 10 healthy canines via a single-masked, crossover study for 7 days. To compare in vitro bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, four Staphylococcus strains were incubated with the BCLs at 37 degrees C for 2 or 24 h, and the bacterial colony forming units (CFUs) adhering to the BCLs were counted. Next, to compare in vivo bacterial adhesion, the CFUs of bacteria adhering to the BCLs worn by canines for 24 h were counted. Anionic lenses significantly retained and reduced in vitro bacterial adhesion than in the zwitterionic lenses. However, the amount of in vitro biofilm formation was more likely to be higher on anionic lenses than on zwitterionic lenses. In vivo bacterial adhesion was not significantly different between the two types of BCLs. Nevertheless, both BCLs were well-tolerated by the canines; thus, their short-term use in dogs can be recommended as safe.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]  
Loh Ky, 2010, Malays Fam Physician, V5, P6
[22]  
LoPinto AJ, 2015, VET OPHTHALMOL, V18, P297, DOI [10.1111/vop.12200, 10.1111/vop.12287]
[23]   ADSORPTION AND ADHESION PROCESSES IN MICROBIAL-GROWTH AT INTERFACES [J].
MARSHALL, KC .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1986, 25 (01) :59-86
[24]  
Mashige KP, 2013, AFR VIS EYE HEALTH J, V72, P185
[25]  
Merritt Judith H, 2005, Curr Protoc Microbiol, VChapter 1, DOI 10.1002/9780471729259.mc01b01s00
[26]   Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis on intraocular lens material [J].
Okajima, Yukinobu ;
Kobayakawa, Shinichiro ;
Tsuji, Akiyoshi ;
Tochikubo, Tetsuo .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (07) :2971-2975
[27]   Biological and Clinical Implications of Lysozyme Deposition on Soft Contact Lenses [J].
Omali, Negar Babaei ;
Subbaraman, Lakshman N. ;
Coles-Brennan, Chantal ;
Fadli, Zohra ;
Jones, Lyndon W. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2015, 92 (07) :750-757
[28]   Survey of bacterial microorganisms in the conjunctival sac of clinically normal dogs and dogs with ulcerative keratitis in Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil [J].
Prado, MR ;
Rocha, MEG ;
Brito, EHS ;
Girao, MD ;
Monteiro, AJ ;
Teixeira, MES ;
Sidrim, JJC .
VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 8 (01) :33-37
[29]   METHOD OF EVALUATING EFFECTS OF ANTIBIOTICS ON BACTERIAL BIOFILM [J].
PROSSER, BL ;
TAYLOR, D ;
DIX, BA ;
CLEELAND, R .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (10) :1502-1506
[30]  
Punjabi S, 2016, INT J RES MED SCI, V4, P4632