Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs

被引:12
作者
Lee, Gwang Chul [1 ]
Lee, Sang Hong [1 ]
Kang, Sin Wook [1 ]
Park, Hyung Seok [1 ]
Jo, Suenghwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chosun Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 365 Pilmundae Ro, Gwangju 61453, South Korea
关键词
Anteversion; Inclination; Hip-centered anteroposterior; Pelvis anteroposterior; Total hip replacement; TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT; ACETABULAR COMPONENT; PLAIN ANTEROPOSTERIOR; CUP ANTEVERSION; RELIABILITY; DISLOCATIONS; VERSION; ARTHROPLASTY; ORIENTATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-019-2979-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several methods using simple anteroposterior (AP) radiographs have been suggested for the measurement of anteversion of the cup component after total hip arthroplasty. Herein, we compared six widely used anteversion measurement methods using two different types of AP radiograph, the conventional pelvis AP and hip-centered AP radiographs, to identify the measurement method and the type of radiograph that would provide the highest accuracy and reliability. Methods: We developed two custom-made bi-planar anteversion measurement models for the validation test. The models were designed for pelvis AP and hip-centered AP radiographs, respectively. The radiographs were acquired using the inclination angles of both models, changing from 10 degrees to 70 degrees at 10 degrees increments. For each inclination angle, anteversion was changed from 0 degrees to 30 degrees at 5 degrees increments. The measurements were obtained independently by two orthopedic surgeons blinded from each other's measurements, using the methods of 1) Pradhan et al., 2) Lewinnek et al., 3) Widmer et al., 4) Liaw et al., 5) Hassan et al., and 6) Ackland et al. The measurements were repeated after 2 months. The accuracy, compared with that of the reference angle, and intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of each method were calculated. Results: The highest accuracy was found when the method of Liaw et al. was used with hip-centered AP radiographs, which showed a difference of 1.37 degrees +/- 1.73 from the reference angle. Moreover, regardless of the type of radiograph, the methods by Pradhan et al., Lewinnek et al., and Liaw et al. showed excellent correlations with the reference anteversion. However, substantial differences were found when the methods by Widmer et al., Hassan et al., and Ackland et al. were used, regardless of the type of radiograph used. When anteversion was measured in an inclination between 30 degrees and 50 degrees, the method of Pradhan et al., when used with pelvis AP radiographs, showed the highest accuracy (1.23 degrees +/- 0.92 degrees). We also found no significant difference in anteversions between the measurements made on pelvic and hip-centered AP radiographs. Both interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were high for all the measurements tested. Conclusions: The methods by Pradhan et al., Liaw et al., and Lewinnek et al. may provide relatively accurate anteversion measurements with high reliability, regardless of the type of radiograph.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   ANTEVERSION OF THE ACETABULAR CUP - MEASUREMENT OF ANGLE AFTER TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT [J].
ACKLAND, MK ;
BOURNE, WB ;
UHTHOFF, HK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1986, 68 (03) :409-413
[2]   Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component [J].
Arai, Noriyuki ;
Nakamura, Shigeru ;
Matsushita, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (05) :715-720
[4]   A Comparison of Surgeon Estimation and Computed Tomographic Measurement of Femoral Component Anteversion in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Dorr, Lawrence D. ;
Wan, Zhinian ;
Malik, Aamer ;
Zhu, Jinjun ;
Dastane, Manish ;
Deshmane, Prashant .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (11) :2598-2604
[5]  
Eijer H., 2001, HIP INT, V11, P37, DOI [10.1177/112070000101100104, DOI 10.1177/112070000101100104]
[6]   CT Outperforms Radiography for Determination of Acetabular Cup Version after THA [J].
Ghelman, Bernard ;
Kepler, Christopher K. ;
Lyman, Stephen ;
Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (09) :2362-2370
[7]  
HARRIS WH, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P188
[8]   RADIOGRAPHIC CALCULATION OF ANTEVERSION IN ACETABULAR PROSTHESES [J].
HASSAN, DM ;
JOHNSTON, GHF ;
DUST, WNC ;
WATSON, LG ;
CASSIDY, D .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1995, 10 (03) :369-372
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[10]   Acetabular Anteversion with CT in Supine, Simulated Standing, and Sitting Positions in a THA Patient Population [J].
Lazennec, Jean-Yves ;
Boyer, Patrick ;
Gorin, Michel ;
Catonne, Yves ;
Rousseau, Marc Antoine .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (04) :1103-1109