Comparison of existing skinfold equations for estimating body fat in African American and white women

被引:11
作者
Brandon, LJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
densitometry; skinfold prediction equations; body fat measurements; underwater weighing; African Americans; whites; women;
D O I
10.1093/ajcn/67.6.1155
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare seven skinfold equations with underwater weighing (UWW) for estimating body fat in 39 African American [age: 22.8 +/- 3.6 y ((x) over bar +/- SD); weight: 59.6 +/- 8.3 kg) and 39 white (age: 22.1 +/- 2.9 y; weight: 61.7 +/- 7.3 kg) women. The hypothesis examined was that the equations would produce more accurate body fat estimates in white women, but would be appropriate for use in African American women. Body fat estimated from two quadratic, three linear, and two logarithmic skinfold equations was compared with body fat estimated from UWW; the same procedures were used to evaluate the results in both African Americans and whites. The data were analyzed by using t tests, analysis of variance, Scheffe's honestly significant difference tests, correlations, error assessments, and agreement. The results showed that total error, SEE, and SD values were larger in the African American women than in the white women and were not within acceptable limits listed in the literature. The correlation coefficients were lower in the African American women than in the white women. Agreement between the skinfold equations and UWW, based on deviations from mean differences, was better in the white women. In conclusion, the skinfold prediction equations evaluated in this study were more variable and produced more error when used in African American women. Therefore, population-specific equations for African American women should be used to estimate body fat because they will probably yield more accurate estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1161
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ADAMSCAMPBELL LL, 1990, J NATL MED ASSOC, V82, P573
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Boileau RA, 1985, Scan J Sports Sci, V7, P17
[4]   DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION REVISION OF SOME QUANTIATIVE ASSUMPTIONS [J].
BROZEK, J ;
ANDERSON, JT ;
KEYS, A ;
GRANDE, F .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1963, 110 (01) :113-&
[5]  
Buskirk ER., 1961, TECH MEAS BODY COMPO, V1961, P90
[6]   BODY FAT ASSESSED FROM TOTAL-BODY DENSITY AND ITS ESTIMATION FROM SKINFOLD THICKNESS - MEASUREMENTS ON 481 MEN AND WOMEN AGED FROM 16 TO 72 YEARS [J].
DURNIN, JVGA ;
WOMERSLEY, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1974, 32 (01) :77-97
[7]   OBESITY AND HYPERTENSION IN BLACKS [J].
DUSTAN, HP .
CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 1990, 4 :395-402
[8]   RELATION OF BODY FATNESS AND ITS DISTRIBUTION TO CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS IN YOUNG BLACKS AND WHITES - THE ROLE OF INSULIN [J].
FOLSOM, AR ;
BURKE, GL ;
BALLEW, C ;
JACOBS, DR ;
HASKELL, WL ;
DONAHUE, RP ;
LIU, K ;
HILNER, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 130 (05) :911-924
[9]   RELATION OF BODY-FAT DISTRIBUTION TO ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE - THE NATIONAL-HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY-I (NHANES-I) EPIDEMIOLOGIC FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
FREEDMAN, DS ;
WILLIAMSON, DF ;
CROFT, JB ;
BALLEW, C ;
BYERS, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 142 (01) :53-63
[10]  
HARSHA DW, 1978, HUM BIOL, V50, P261