Natural Language Processing for Learning Assessment in STEM

被引:5
作者
Caratozzolo, Patricia [1 ]
Rodriguez-Ruiz, Jorge [2 ]
Alvarez-Delgado, Alvaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Inst Future Educ, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Engn & Sci, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Humanities & Educ, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON 2022) | 2022年
关键词
Educational innovation; STEM; higher education; learning assessment; NLTK with [!text type='Python']Python[!/text;
D O I
10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766717
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Education 4.0 Framework reveals the need for the curricula of Higher Education Institutions to incorporate new learning approaches, along with new Competency Assessment Models. In the case of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) programs, the inclusion of new technological tools is relevant to effectively assess the level reached by students in the development of transversal skills. NLP (Natural language processing) is a practical approach to understanding the effectiveness of learning processes because it provides solutions in various fields associated with the social and cultural context of Competency-Based Learning. In this study, we evaluate the usefulness of integrating NLP tools in evaluation procedures in advanced STEM subjects to aid the educator in developing competencies outside its core subject expertise. Different instruments were considered: surveys, questionnaires, interviews, observation lists, rubrics, and other tools to handle parametric data statistically. The study's findings confirmed that the NLP tools are handy to evaluate higher-order functions and determine levels of cognitive understanding of concepts. Additionally, results showed that NLP tools could support instructors in carrying out better review and feedback sessions and providing personalized reports on oral and written communication skills.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1554
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Allen M.W., 2014, SAM, the Savvy Start, and Agile Instructional Design, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, World Economic Forum Reports, V2020, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], NATURAL LANGUAGE TOO
[4]  
Arter J., 2000, Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance
[5]   Improving critical thinking skills and metacognitive monitoring through direct infusion [J].
Bensley, D. Alan ;
Spero, Rachel A. .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2014, 12 :55-68
[6]  
Berdanier C.G. P., 2020, PROC FRONT EDUC CONF, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/fie44824.2020.9274115, 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274115]
[7]  
Caratozzolo Patricia, 2021, Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative and Blended Learning (ICBL2020). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC 1314), P419, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_45
[8]  
Caratozzolo P., 2021, P INT C ED, V7, P614
[9]  
Caratozzolo P, 2019, IEEE GLOB ENG EDUC C, P221, DOI [10.1109/educon.2019.8725094, 10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725094]
[10]   Digital storytelling in teacher education and its effect on the digital literacy of pre-service teachers [J].
Cetin, Ekmel .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2021, 39