Investment strategy of hydrothermal geothermal heating in China under policy, technology and geology uncertainties

被引:40
作者
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Siyuan [1 ]
Tan, Zhizhou [1 ]
Zhang, Tiantian [1 ]
Mclellan, Benjamin [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Acad Chinese Energy Strategy, 18 Fuxue Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Energy Sci, Sakyo Ku, Yoshida Honmachi, Kyoto, Japan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hydrothermal geothermal heating; Uncertain geological conditions; Real options; Supporting policies; REAL OPTION VALUATION; PUMP SYSTEM; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; POWER-GENERATION; CARBON CAPTURE; MODEL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.240
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geothermal energy has been considered as a new and promising source of clean heating in some areas in China. However, huge initial investment cost and high uncertainties in policy, geology and technology have been seriously hindering its development. Developing effective policies and strategies to attract more investment for geothermal heating is a big challenge for the government. Therefore, a real option model was proposed to find the optimal investment strategy for hydrothermal geothermal heating projects with average well depth of 1350 m under various uncertainties in policy, technology and geological aspects. Meanwhile, an integrated Thermo-Hydrological Coupling Model was developed to calculate the relationship between geological conditions and the geothermal heating economics. Nine geological scenarios were proposed considering different geothermal gradient and rock permeability and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of different supporting policies and mechanisms. Based on obtained empirical results, it was concluded that, (i). The real option analysis framework is more applicable in exploring investment strategy of hydrothermal heating projects than discounted cash flow method: (ii). Higher subsidy level has an obvious impact on investment value but very limited impact on timing: (iii). Technology progress and flexible subsidy phase-out mechanism can attract the investment effectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 29
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHIN MANAG SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, THESIS
[3]   Temperature distributions in pavement and bridge slabs heated by using vertical ground-source heat pump systems [J].
Balbay, Asim ;
Esen, Mehmet .
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 35 (04) :677-685
[4]  
Balbay A, 2010, SCI RES ESSAYS, V5, P3955
[5]   An uncertainty analysis of subsidy for carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofitting investment in China's coal power plants using a real-options approach [J].
Chen, Huadong ;
Wang, Can ;
Ye, Minhua .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 :200-212
[6]   An efficient optimization of well placement and control for a geothermal prospect under geological uncertainty [J].
Chen, Mingjie ;
Tompson, Andrew F. B. ;
Mellors, Robert J. ;
Abdalla, Osman .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 137 :352-363
[7]   Investment strategy for underground gas storage facilities based on real option model considering gas market reform in China [J].
Chen, Siyuan ;
Zhang, Qi ;
Wang, Ge ;
Zhu, Lijing ;
Li, Yan .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 70 :132-142
[8]   Real options for risk management in petroleum development investments [J].
Chorn, L. G. ;
Shokhor, S. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (04) :489-505
[9]   IRREVERSIBLE INVESTMENT WITH PRICE CEILINGS [J].
DIXIT, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (03) :541-557
[10]  
Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN