MRI T2 Mapping of Knee Articular Cartilage Using Different Acquisition Sequences and Calculation Methods at 1.5 Tesla
被引:17
|
作者:
Mars, Mokhtar
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, TunisiaTunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
Mars, Mokhtar
[1
]
Chelli, Mouna
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tunis Univ EL Manar, Fac Med Tunis, Dept Radiol, Kassab Inst Orthoped, Tunis, TunisiaTunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
Chelli, Mouna
[2
]
Tbini, Zeineb
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, TunisiaTunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
Tbini, Zeineb
[1
]
Ladeb, Fethi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tunis Univ EL Manar, Fac Med Tunis, Dept Radiol, Kassab Inst Orthoped, Tunis, TunisiaTunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
Ladeb, Fethi
[2
]
Gharbi, Souha
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, TunisiaTunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
Gharbi, Souha
[1
]
机构:
[1] Tunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] Tunis Univ EL Manar, Fac Med Tunis, Dept Radiol, Kassab Inst Orthoped, Tunis, Tunisia
Objective: This study aims to determine how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition techniques and calculation methods affect T2 values of knee cartilage at 1.5 tesla and to identify sequences that can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping in short scanning times. Materials and Methods: This study was performed on phantom and 29 patients who underwent MRI of the knee joint at 1.5 tesla. The protocol includes T2 mapping sequences based on Single-Echo Spin Echo (SESE), Multi-Echo Spin Echo (MESE), Fast Spin Echo (FSE) and Turbo Gradient Spin Echo (TGSE). The T2 relaxation times were quantified and evaluated using three calculation methods (MapIt, Syngo Offline and mono-exponential fit). signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were measured in all sequences. All statistical analyses were performed using the t-test. Results: The average T2 values in phantom were 41.7 +/- 13.8 ms for SESE, 43.2 +/- 14.4 ms for MESE, 42.4 +/- 14.1 ms for FSE and 44 +/- 14.5 ms for TGSE. In the patient study, the mean differences were 6.5 +/- 8.2 ms, 7.8 +/- 7.6 ms and 8.4 +/- 14.2 ms for MESE, FSE and TGSE compared to SESE, respectively; these statistical results were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The comparison between the three calculation methods showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The t-test showed no significant difference between SNR values for all sequences. Conclusion: T2 values depend not only on the sequence type but also on the calculation method. None of the sequences revealed significant differences compared to the SESE reference sequence. TGSE with its short scanning time can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping. (c) 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel