Views of American animal and dairy science students on the future of dairy farms and public expectations for dairy cattle care: A focus group study

被引:9
作者
Ritter, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Russell, Elizabeth R. [1 ]
Weary, Daniel M. [1 ]
von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Anim Welf Program, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Atlantic Vet Coll, Dept Hlth Management, 550 Univ Ave, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
关键词
agricultural education; social license; animal welfare; public attitudes; citizen values; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; WELFARE; AMBIVALENCE; PERCEPTIONS; ATTITUDES; CITIZENS; CODEBOOK;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2020-19732
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Students completing advanced degrees in dairy or animal science may go on to have a major impact on the food animal agriculture industries. The aim of this study was to better understand student views of the future of dairying, including changes in practices affecting animal care on farms as well as perceived public perceptions. We conducted 6 focus group sessions with undergraduate students enrolled in the 2019 US Dairy Education and Training Consortium held in Clovis, New Mexico, and used explorative key word analysis of written notes and thematic analysis of the semi -structured discussions. Some "must-haves" of future animal care on dairy farms included increased use of technology, group housing of calves, and adequate facilities, including enrichment. Students also discussed their views of public expectations regarding animal care on dairy farms, and measures that they felt must be put into place to address these expectations in the coming years. Although the influence of the public was highlighted by the students, they were not always certain what specific values the public holds and doubted the feasibility and practicality of some expectations, such as providing pasture access or keeping the calf and cow together. They further demonstrated uncertainty about how best to align the directions of the industry with public expectations. Although they felt that public education could be used to demonstrate the legitimacy of dairy practices, they also believed that the industry should strive to find compromises and work toward meeting public expectations. Deciding what animal welfare considerations (e.g., naturalness, affective states, or animal health) were most relevant was a challenge for the students, perhaps reflecting diverging messages received during their own education.
引用
收藏
页码:7984 / 7995
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare
    Alonso, Marta E.
    Gonzalez-Montana, Jose R.
    Lomillos, Juan M.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, TECHNICAL PAPER NO 3
  • [3] Best Practice in Supporting Professional Identity Formation: Use of a Professional Reasoning Framework
    Armitage-Chan, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 47 (02) : 125 - 136
  • [4] The influences of curriculum area and student background on mindset to learning in the veterinary curriculum: a pilot study
    Armitage-Chan, Elizabeth
    Maddison, Jill
    [J]. VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2019, 5 (03) : 470 - 482
  • [5] Invited review: A systematic review of the effects of early separation on dairy cow and calf health
    Beaver, Annabelle
    Meagher, Rebecca K.
    von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
    Weary, Daniel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (07) : 5784 - 5810
  • [6] Exploring the Potential of Dutch Pig Farmers and Urban-Citizens to Learn Through Frame Reflection
    Benard, Marianne
    Buning, Tjard de Cock
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2013, 26 (05) : 1015 - 1036
  • [7] Moral intensity and willingness to pay concerning farm animal welfare issues and the implications for agricultural policy
    Bennett, RM
    Anderson, J
    Blaney, RJP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2002, 15 (02) : 187 - 202
  • [8] Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming: The Ambivalence Between the Two Faces of Modernity
    Boogaard, Birgit K.
    Bock, Bettina B.
    Oosting, Simon J.
    Wiskerke, Johannes S. C.
    van der Zijpp, Akke J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2011, 24 (03) : 259 - 282
  • [9] Boykoff MaxwellT., 2009, Global Environmental Politics, V9, P123, DOI [10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.123, DOI 10.1162/GLEP.2009.9.2.123]
  • [10] Cambridge Business Dictionary, 2011, GEN PUBLIC, DOI [10.1007/s41055-017-0019-z, DOI 10.1007/S41055-017-0019-Z]