Auditory Temporal Gap Detection in Children with and without Auditory Processing Disorder

被引:28
作者
Phillips, Dennis P. [1 ,2 ]
Comeau, Michel [3 ]
Andrus, Jessica N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Surg, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada
[3] IWK Hosp Children, Nova Scotia Hearing & Speech Clin, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Human Commun Disorders, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Auditory processing disorder; gap detection; perceptual event timing; temporal acuity; DETECTION THRESHOLDS; FREQUENCY; CHANNEL; PERFORMANCE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.21.6.5
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Auditory gap detection is a measure of temporal acuity. The paradigm comes in two forms, distinguished by whether the sounds bounding the silent period are the same (within channel [WC]) or different (between channel [BC]). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test normal children and children referred for auditory processing disorder (APD) assessment, with both gap detection paradigms. Research Design: Best gap durations (i.e., shortest reliably detected gaps) were measured in a two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice design embedded within a modified method of limits, for both WC and BC paradigms, with stimuli presented at 55 dB HL. Study Sample: Sixteen control children and 20 children referred for APD assessment participated in the study. Of the 20 referred children, 9 were diagnostically positive for APD (APD+), and 11 were negative (APD-). The mean age of children in all three groups was 10-11 yr. Data Collection and Analysis: Data collected were best gap durations for each paradigm, for each child. Group differences were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analyses of variance. Results: WC best gap durations were very similar across the three participant groups. BC best gap durations varied significantly between listener groups, with the greatest difference being between controls and APD+ samples. Conclusions: BC best gap durations differed among the listener groups while WC ones did not. This suggests that the relative timing perceptual operations required by the BC task are more susceptible to the perceptual disturbances in APD than is the simple event detection required by the WC task.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 408
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] *AM SPEECH LANG HE, 2005, AUD PROC DIS
  • [2] Ear and contralateral masker effects on auditory temporal gap detection thresholds
    Carmichael, Martha E.
    Hall, Susan E.
    Phillips, Dennis P.
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 245 (1-2) : 18 - 23
  • [3] Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants
    Elangovan, Saravanan
    Stuart, Andrew
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (05) : 761 - 774
  • [4] DETECTION OF TEMPORAL GAPS WITHIN AND BETWEEN PERCEPTUAL TONAL GROUPS
    FITZGIBBONS, PJ
    POLLATSEK, A
    THOMAS, IB
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (03): : 522 - 528
  • [5] Evidence for an across-frequency, between-channel process in asymptotic monaural temporal gap detection
    Formby, C
    Gerber, MJ
    Sherlock, LP
    Magder, LS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 103 (06) : 3554 - 3560
  • [6] Gap detection for similar and dissimilar gap markers
    Grose, JH
    Hall, JW
    Buss, E
    Hatch, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (04) : 1587 - 1595
  • [7] Howell D.C., 1997, STAT METHODS PSYCHOL, VForth
  • [8] Jerger J, 2000, J Am Acad Audiol, V11, P467
  • [9] Katz J., 1998, The Staggered Spondaic Word Test (SSW) Fifth Edition
  • [10] Keith R.W., 2000, Test for auditory processing disorder in children-revised