Mapping benthic biodiversity using georeferenced environmental data and predictive modeling

被引:11
作者
Peterson, Anneliis [1 ]
Herkul, Kristjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Estonian Marine Inst, Maealuse 14, EE-12618 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Biodiversity; Species richness; Benthos; Spatial prediction; Baltic Sea; Distribution modeling; INCORPORATING SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; LONG-TERM CHANGES; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; BALTIC SEA; PHYSICAL DISTURBANCE; LARGE-SCALE; MARINE; DIVERSITY; HABITATS; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12526-017-0765-5
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Biodiversity is critical for maintaining and stabilizing ecosystem processes. There is a need for high-resolution biodiversity maps that cover large sea areas in order to address ecological questions related to biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships and to provide data for marine environmental protection and management decisions. However, traditional sampling-point-wise field work is not suitable for covering extensive areas in high detail. Spatial predictive modeling using biodiversity data from sampling points and georeferenced environmental data layers covering the whole study area is a potential way to create biodiversity maps for large spatial extents. Random forest (RF), generalized additive models (GAM), and boosted regression trees (BRT) were used in this study to produce benthic (macroinvertebrates, macrophytes) biodiversity maps in the northern Baltic Sea. Environmental raster layers (wave exposure, salinity, temperature, etc.) were used as independent variables in the models to predict the spatial distribution of species richness. A validation dataset containing data that was not included in model calibration was used to compare the prediction accuracy of the models. Each model was also evaluated visually to check for possible modeling artifacts that are not revealed by mathematical validation. All three models proved to have high predictive ability. RF and BRT predictions had higher correlations with validation data and lower mean absolute error than those of GAM. Both mathematically and visually, the predictions by RF and BRT were very similar. Depth and seabed sediments were the most influential abiotic variables in predicting the spatial patterns of biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 146
页数:16
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, MAN MAR MON COMBINE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, METHODS STUDY MARINE
[4]   Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling [J].
Austin, MP .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 157 (2-3) :101-118
[5]   Macroalgal canopies:: distribution and diversity of associated invertebrates and effects on the recruitment and growth of mussels [J].
Bégin, C ;
Johnson, LE ;
Himmelman, JH .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2004, 271 :121-132
[6]   Ventilation of bottom water in the North Sea-Baltic Sea transition zone [J].
Bendtsen, Jorgen ;
Gustafsson, Karin E. ;
Soederkvist, Johan ;
Hansen, Jorgen L. S. .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2009, 75 (1-2) :138-149
[7]   A conceptual framework for marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning [J].
Boero, Ferdinando ;
Bonsdorff, Erik .
MARINE ECOLOGY-AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE, 2007, 28 :134-145
[8]   Zoobenthic diversity-gradients in the Baltic Sea: Continuous post-glacial succession in a stressed ecosystem [J].
Bonsdorff, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2006, 330 (01) :383-391
[9]   Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity -: the importance of seagrass shoot-density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment [J].
Boström, C ;
Bonsdorff, E .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2000, 205 :123-138
[10]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32