The Use of Sociocultural Constructs in Cancer Screening Research Among African Americans

被引:30
作者
Deshpande, Anjali D. [1 ]
Thompson, Vetta L. Sanders [2 ,3 ]
Vaughn, Kimberlee P. [2 ,3 ]
Kreuter, Matthew W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth, Div Epidemiol, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Commun Res Lab, Div Behav Sci, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Excellence Canc Commun, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; PROSTATE-CANCER; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; HEALTH DISPARITIES; RACIAL-DIFFERENCES; MEDICAL MISTRUST; CULTURAL-FACTORS; WOMEN; BLACK; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1177/107327480901600308
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Studies are increasingly examining the role of sociocultural values, beliefs, and attitudes in cancer prevention. However, these studies vary widely in how sociocultural constructs are defined and measured, how they are conceived as affecting cancer beliefs, behaviors, and screening, and how they are applied in interventions. Methods: To characterize the current state of this research literature, we conducted a critical review of studies published between 1990 and 2006 to describe the current use of sociocultural constructs in cancer screening research among African Americans. We included quantitative and qualitative studies with cancer as a primary focus that included African American participants, assessed screening behaviors, reported race-specific analyses, and considered one or more sociocultural factors. Studies were evaluated for type of cancer and screening analyzed, study population, methodology, sociocultural constructs considered, definitions of constructs, provision of psychometric data for measures, and journal characteristics. Results: Of 94 studies identified for review, 35 met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Most focused on breast cancer screening, and thus African American women. Sociocultural constructs were seldom clearly defined, and the sources and psychometric properties of sociocultural measures were rarely reported. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach to developing a common language and a standardized set of measures for sociocultural constructs will advance research in this area. Specific recommendations are made for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 265
页数:10
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [91] Variables affecting racial-identity salience among African Americans
    Thompson, VLS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 139 (06) : 748 - 761
  • [92] Triandis Harry, 1994, McGraw-Hill Series in Social Psychology
  • [93] THE MEASUREMENT OF THE ETIC ASPECTS OF INDIVIDUALISM AND COLLECTIVISM ACROSS CULTURES
    TRIANDIS, HC
    BONTEMPO, R
    BETANCOURT, H
    BOND, M
    LEUNG, K
    BRENES, A
    GEORGAS, J
    HUI, CH
    MARIN, G
    SETIADI, B
    SINHA, JBP
    VERMA, J
    SPANGENBERG, J
    TOUZARD, H
    DEMONTMOLLIN, G
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 38 (03) : 257 - 267
  • [94] Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status
    Ward, E
    Jemal, A
    Cokkinides, V
    Singh, GK
    Cardinez, C
    Ghafoor, A
    Thun, M
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2004, 54 (02) : 78 - 93
  • [95] Interest in genetic prostate cancer susceptibility testing among African American men
    Weinrich, S
    Royal, C
    Pettaway, CA
    Dunston, G
    Faison-Smith, L
    Priest, JH
    Roberson-Smith, P
    Frost, J
    Jenkins, J
    Brooks, KA
    Powell, I
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2002, 25 (01) : 28 - 34