Is 18F-FDG PET accurate to predict neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer? A meta-analysis

被引:115
作者
Wang, Yuting [1 ]
Zhang, Chengpeng [1 ]
Liu, Jianjun [1 ]
Huang, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Renji Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meta-analysis; F-18-FDG PET; Breast cancer; Prediction; Therapy; Response; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR RESPONSE; FDG-PET; PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-011-1780-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Clinical evidence regarding the value of F-18-FDG PET for therapy responses assessment in breast cancer is increasing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of F-18-FDG PET in predicting responses to neoadjuvant therapies with meta-analysis and explore its optimal regimen for clinical use. Articles in English language relating to the accuracy of F-18-FDG PET for this utility were retrieved. Methodological quality was assessed by QUADAS tool. Pooled estimation and subgroup analysis data were obtained by statistical analysis. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and involved 920 pathologically confirmed patients in total (mean age 49.8 years, all female). Methodological quality was relatively high. To predict histopathological response in primary breast lesions by PET, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio were 84% (95% CI, 78-88%), 66% (95% CI, 62-70%), 50% (95% CI, 44-55%), 91% (95% CI, 87-94%), and 11.90 (95% CI, 6.33-22.36), respectively. In regional lymph nodes, sensitivity and NPV of PET were 92% (95% CI, 83-97%) and 88% (95% CI, 76-95%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that performing a post-therapy F-18-FDG PET early (after the 1st or 2nd cycle of chemotherapy) was significantly better than later (accuracy 76% vs. 65%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, the best correlation with pathology was yielded by employing a reduction rate (RR) cutoff value of standardized uptake value between 55 and 65%. F-18-FDG PET is useful to predict neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer. However, the relatively low specificity and PPV still call for caution. It is suggested to perform PET in an earlier course of therapy and use RR cutoff value between 55 and 65%, which might potentially identify non-responders early. However, further prospective studies are warranted to assess this regimen and adequately position PET in treatment management.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 369
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CANCER
[2]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL
[3]   Response to Therapy in Breast Cancer [J].
Avril, Norbert ;
Sassen, Stefanie ;
Roylance, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 :55S-63S
[4]  
Bassa P, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P931
[5]   [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina ;
Touzery, Claude ;
Riedinger, Jean-Marc ;
Toubeau, Michel ;
Coudert, Bruno ;
Arnould, Laurent ;
Boichot, Christophe ;
Cochet, Alexandre ;
Fumoleau, Pierre ;
Brunotte, Francois .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (12) :1915-1924
[6]   The Role of PET CT to Evaluate the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: Comparison With Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Choi, Jae Hyuck ;
Lim, Hye In ;
Lee, Se Kyung ;
Kim, Wan Wook ;
Kim, Sang Min ;
Cho, Eunyoon ;
Ko, Eun Young ;
Han, Boo-Kyung ;
Park, Yeon Hee ;
Ahn, Jin-Seok ;
Im, Young-Hyuck ;
Lee, Jeong Eon ;
Yang, Jung-Hyun ;
Nam, Seok Jin .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 102 (05) :392-397
[7]   Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer [J].
Dose-Schwarz, J. ;
Tiling, R. ;
Avril-Sassen, S. ;
Mahner, S. ;
Lebeau, A. ;
Weber, C. ;
Schwaiger, M. ;
Jaenicke, F. ;
Untch, M. ;
Avril, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 102 (01) :35-41
[8]   Preoperative [18F] FDG-PET after chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: prognostic value as compared with histopathology [J].
Emmering, J. ;
Krak, N. C. ;
Van der Hoeven, J. J. M. ;
Spreeuwenberg, M. D. ;
Twisk, J. W. R. ;
Meijer, S. ;
Pinedo, H. M. ;
Hoekstra, O. S. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (09) :1573-1577
[9]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[10]   Prognostic Impact of [18F] FDG-PET in Operable Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Jung, So-Youn ;
Kim, Seok-Ki ;
Nam, Byung-Ho ;
Min, Sun Young ;
Lee, Seung Joo ;
Park, Chansung ;
Kwon, Youngmee ;
Kim, Eun-A ;
Ko, Kyoung Lan ;
Park, In Hae ;
Lee, Keun Seok ;
Shin, Kyung Hwan ;
Lee, Seeyoun ;
Kim, Seok Won ;
Kang, Han-Sung ;
Ro, Jungsil .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) :247-253