MRI-based determination of occlusal splint thickness for temporomandibular joint disk derangement: a randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:23
作者
Hegab, Ayman F. [1 ]
Youssef, Ahmed Hossni [2 ]
Abd Al Hameed, Hossam I. [3 ]
Karam, Khaled Said [3 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Dent, Prosthodont, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med Men, Diagnost Radiol, Cairo, Egypt
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY | 2018年 / 125卷 / 01期
关键词
PAIN-DYSFUNCTION SYNDROME; STABILIZATION SPLINT; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; OROFACIAL PAIN; TMJ SPACE; DISORDERS; THERAPY; POSITION; DISPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2017.09.017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. This prospective study examined a method using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the appropriate effective occlusal splint vertical thickness in the management of disk derangement. Study Design. Patients were diagnosed as having internal disk displacement of the temporomandibular joint and were divided into 2 groups. Group I (disk displacement with reduction) was subdivided randomly into 2 subgroups: subgroup IA (control group) comprising patients treated with 3-mm-thick splints; and subgroup IB (study group) comprising patients treated with MRI-based splint thickness. Group II (disk displacement without reduction) was subdivided randomly into 2 subgroups: subgroup IIA (control group) comprising patients treated with 3-mm-thick splints; and subgroup IIB (study group) comprising patients treated with MRI-based splint thickness. The primary outcome variables were maximum voluntary mouth opening and visual analogue scale scores for pain. The secondary outcome variable was joint sound. The final sample was composed of 162 patients (Group I = 90 and Group II = 72). Results. Statistical analysis showed significant improvement of the clinical outcomes in subgroups IB and IIB compared with that in subgroups IA and IIA. Conclusions. On the basis of MRI measurements and clinical outcome, the present study we recommend 4-mm and 6-mm vertical splint thickness for disk displacement with reduction and disk displacement without reduction, respectively, for 1 year.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 87
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abekura H, 2008, INT J PROSTHODONT, V21, P116
[2]  
Alajbeg IZ, 2003, COLLEGIUM ANTROPOL, V27, P361
[3]  
Alkan A., 2008, EUR J DENT, V2, P276, DOI DOI 10.1055/S-0039-1697392
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[5]   Osteopathic manual therapy versus conventional conservative therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Cuccia, A. M. ;
Caradonna, C. ;
Annunziata, V. ;
Caradonna, D. .
JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2010, 14 (02) :179-184
[6]   Oral splints: The crutches for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism? [J].
Dao, TTT ;
Lavigne, GJ .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 1998, 9 (03) :345-361
[7]  
Dylina Tim J, 2002, Dent Today, V21, P82
[8]   A common-sense approach to splint therapy [J].
Dylina, TJ .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 86 (05) :539-545
[9]  
Ekberg E, 1998, INT J PROSTHODONT, V11, P263
[10]   Stereometric assessment of TMJ space variation by occlusal splints [J].
Ettlin, D. A. ;
Mang, H. ;
Colombo, V. ;
Palla, S. ;
Gallo, L. M. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2008, 87 (09) :877-881