COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer

被引:293
|
作者
Deijen, Charlotte L. [1 ]
Velthuis, Simone [2 ]
Tsai, Alice [3 ]
Mavroveli, Stella [3 ]
de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. [1 ]
Sietses, Colin [2 ]
Tuynman, Jurriaan B. [1 ]
Lacy, Antonio M. [4 ]
Hanna, George B. [3 ]
Bonjer, H. Jaap [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Postbus 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Gelderse Vallei Hosp Ede, Dept Surg, Ede, Netherlands
[3] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2016年 / 30卷 / 08期
关键词
Transanal; Total mesorectal excision; TME; TaTME; Laparoscopic; Rectal cancer; Surgical quality; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; OPEN SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Total mesorectal excision (TME) is an essential component of surgical management of rectal cancer. Both open and laparoscopic TME have been proven to be oncologically safe. However, it remains a challenge to achieve complete TME with clear circumferential resections margin (CRM) with the conventional transabdominal approach, particularly in mid and low rectal tumours. Transanal TME (TaTME) was developed to improve oncological and functional outcomes of patients with mid and low rectal cancer. An international, multicentre, superiority, randomised trial was designed to compare TaTME and conventional laparoscopic TME as the surgical treatment of mid and low rectal carcinomas. The primary endpoint is involved CRM. Secondary endpoints include completeness of mesorectum, residual mesorectum, morbidity and mortality, local recurrence, disease-free and overall survival, percentage of sphincter-saving procedures, functional outcome and quality of life. A Quality Assurance Protocol including centralised MRI review, histopathology re-evaluation, standardisation of surgical techniques, and monitoring and assessment of surgical quality will be conducted. The difference in involvement of CRM between the two treatment strategies is thought to be in favour of the TaTME. TaTME is therefore expected to be superior to laparoscopic TME in terms of oncological outcomes in case of mid and low rectal carcinomas.
引用
收藏
页码:3210 / 3215
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer
    Charlotte L. Deijen
    Simone Velthuis
    Alice Tsai
    Stella Mavroveli
    Elly S. M. de Lange-de Klerk
    Colin Sietses
    Jurriaan B. Tuynman
    Antonio M. Lacy
    George B. Hanna
    H. Jaap Bonjer
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 3210 - 3215
  • [2] Transanal TATA/TME: a case-matched study of taTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer
    Marks, J. H.
    Montenegro, G. A.
    Salem, J. F.
    Shields, M. V.
    Marks, G. J.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (07) : 467 - 473
  • [3] Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches
    Ryan, Odhran K.
    Ryan, Eanna J.
    Creavin, Ben
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Kelly, Michael E.
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Kennelly, Rory
    Hanly, Ann
    Martin, Sean T.
    Winter, Des C.
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (02): : 285 - 295
  • [4] Transanal TATA/TME: a case-matched study of taTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer
    J. H. Marks
    G. A. Montenegro
    J. F. Salem
    M. V. Shields
    G. J. Marks
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2016, 20 : 467 - 473
  • [5] Comparison of the short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME
    Chen, Yu-Ting
    Kiu, Kee-Thai
    Yen, Min-Hsuan
    Chang, Tung-Cheng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (06) : 674 - 680
  • [6] Transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a case-matched study comparing TaTME versus standard laparoscopic TME
    Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
    Nowakowski, Michal
    Wierdak, Mateusz
    Mizera, Magdalena
    Dembinski, Marcin
    Pisarska, Magdalena
    Major, Piotr
    Malczak, Piotr
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 5239 - 5245
  • [7] Comparing efficacy and safety of transanal vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: Updated meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xiao
    Chen, Jiang
    He, Feng
    Du, Wenchun
    Li, Xianhe
    Yu, Xianhao
    EJSO, 2025, 51 (03):
  • [8] Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis
    Aubert, Mathilde
    Mege, Diane
    Panis, Yves
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (09): : 3908 - 3919
  • [9] Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: A case matched study
    Ye, Jingwang
    Tian, Yue
    Li, Fan
    van Oostendorp, Stefan
    Chai, Yiming
    Tuynman, Jurriaan
    Tong, Weidong
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (05): : 1019 - 1025
  • [10] A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design
    Lelong, Bernard
    de Chaisemartin, Cecile
    Meillat, Helene
    Cournier, Sandra
    Boher, Jean Marie
    Genre, Dominique
    Karoui, Mehdi
    Tuech, Jean Jacques
    Delpero, Jean Robert
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17