Workplace bullying: How do bystanders' emotions and the type of bullying influence their willingness to help?

被引:14
作者
Desrumaux, Pascale [1 ]
Jeoffrion, Christine [2 ]
Bouterfas, Naouelle [1 ]
De Bosscher, Sabine [1 ]
Boudenghan, Methode C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille SHS, EA 4072, PSITEC Psychol Interact Temps Emot Cognit, Work & Org Psychol, F-59000 Psitec, France
[2] Univ Nantes, Lab Pays Loire LPPL UPRES EA 4638, Dept Psychol, Social & Work Psychol, BP 81 227, F-44312 Nantes 3, France
[3] Univ Libreville, Work & Org Psychol, Libreville, Gabon
关键词
bullying; fairness; emotions; help giving; re-victimization; anti-social/pro-social behaviors; ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIORS; NEGATIVE ACTS; WORK; EXPOSURE; VICTIMS; RESPONSIBILITY; SERIOUSNESS; AGGRESSION; HARASSMENT; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1080/19012276.2018.1430610
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study asks, how do various bullying acts, re-victimization, and the victim's own behaviors influence witnesses' judgments of the bullying and their inclination to help the victim? Using vignettes, we examined participants' reactions to stories. The independent variables were type of bullying act, victim's pro- or anti-social behaviors at work, and re-victimization. The dependent variables were equity judgments, positive and negative emotions toward the victim and the perpetrator, and the giving of help. Eight vignettes of bullying at work were submitted to 145 participants.The results showed that the situation was judged less equitable by witnesses, and their willingness to give support to the target was increased (1) when the perpetrator's acts were serious and, (2) when the bullied victim's behavior was pro-social, not anti-social. Female employees found the situation more unfair and declared more intentions to help than their male colleagues. The intention to help increased when the victim had shown pro-social behaviors and when the victim had been bullied previously. Emotions toward the victim were mainly positive, and emotions toward the perpetrator mainly negative except in the case where the harassed victim had shown anti-social behavior. The more serious the bullying acts, the more the witness felt sympathy and empathic emotions such as fear and sadness toward the victim, while feeling anger and disgust toward the perpetrator.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 277
页数:19
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Approaches to emotion
[2]   A Qualitative Study on the Development of Workplace Bullying: Towards a Three Way Model [J].
Baillien, Elfi ;
Neyens, Inge ;
De Witte, Hans ;
De Cuyper, Nele .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 19 (01) :1-16
[3]  
Baron RA, 1996, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V22, P161
[4]   The Effects of Harassment Severity and Organizational Behavior on Damage Awards in a Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Case [J].
Cass, Stacie A. ;
Levett, Lora M. ;
Kovera, Margaret Bull .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2010, 28 (03) :303-321
[5]   Dealing with Bullying in the workplace Toward Zero Tolerance [J].
Cleary, Michelle ;
Hunt, Glenn E. ;
Walter, Garry ;
Robertson, Michael .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL NURSING AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, 2009, 47 (12) :34-41
[6]  
D'Cruz P., 2012, Workplace bullying in India
[7]   The limits to workplace friendship Managerialist HRM and bystander behaviour in the context of workplace bullying [J].
D'Cruz, Premilla ;
Noronha, Ernesto .
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS, 2011, 33 (03) :269-288
[8]  
Darley J.M., 1970, The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help?
[9]   The impact of job demands, climate, and optimism on well-being and distress at work: What are the mediating effects of basic psychological need satisfaction? [J].
Desrumaux, P. ;
Lapointe, D. ;
Sima, M. Ntsame ;
Boudrias, J-S ;
Savoie, A. ;
Brunet, L. .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 2015, 65 (04) :179-188
[10]   PRO- AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOURS IN THE WORKPLACE: VALIDATION OF TWO SCALES OF MEASUREMENT AND THEIR LINKS WITH ORGANIZATIONAL AND INDIVIDUAL INDUCTORS [J].
Desrumaux, P. ;
Leoni, V. ;
Bernaud, J. -L. ;
Defrancq, C. .
TRAVAIL HUMAIN, 2012, 75 (01) :55-87