Visual and central attention share a capacity limitation when the demands for serial item selection in visual search are high

被引:4
作者
Reimer, Christina B. [1 ,2 ]
Schubert, Torsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Psychol, Emil Abderhalden Str 26-27, D-06108 Halle, Saale, Germany
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Henri Dunatlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Visual attention; Visual search; Central attention; Response selection; Locus-of-slack method; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; RESPONSE-SELECTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; FEATURE-BINDING; GUIDED SEARCH; BOTTLENECK; PARALLEL; PERFORMANCE; DEPLOYMENT; TASKS;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-019-01903-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Visual and central attention are limited in capacity. In conjunction search, visual attention is required to select the items and to bind their features (e.g., color, form, size), which results in a serial search process. In dual-tasks, central attention is required for response selection, but because central attention is limited in capacity, response selection can only be carried out for one task at a time. Here, we investigated whether visual and central attention rely on a common or on distinct capacity limitations. In two dual-task experiments, participants completed an auditory two-choice discrimination Task 1 and a conjunction search Task 2 that were presented with an experimentally modulated temporal interval between them (stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA]). In Experiment 1, Task 2 was a triple conjunction search task. Each item consisted of a conjunction of three features, so that target and distractors shared two features. In Experiment 2, Task 2 was a plus conjunction search task, in which target and distractors shared the same four features. The hypotheses for conjunction search time were derived from the locus-of-slack method. While plus conjunction search was performed after response selection in Task 1, a small part of triple conjunction search was still performed in parallel to response selection in Task 1. However, the between-experiment comparison was not significant, indicating that both search tasks may require central attention. Taken together, the present study provides evidence that visual and central attention share a common capacity limitation when conjunction search relies strongly on serial item selection.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 728
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4 [J].
Bichot, NP ;
Rossi, AF ;
Desimone, R .
SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5721) :529-534
[2]   Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention [J].
Brisson, Benoit ;
Jolicoeur, Pierre .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (01) :126-132
[3]   A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: Multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials [J].
Brisson, Benoit ;
Jolicoeur, Pierre .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (02) :323-333
[4]   Visual attention: The past 25 years [J].
Carrasco, Marisa .
VISION RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (13) :1484-1525
[5]   The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem [J].
Di Lollo, Vincent .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (06) :317-321
[6]   VISUAL-SEARCH AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY [J].
DUNCAN, J ;
HUMPHREYS, GW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (03) :433-458
[7]   BEYOND THE SEARCH SURFACE - VISUAL-SEARCH AND ATTENTIONAL ENGAGEMENT [J].
DUNCAN, J ;
HUMPHREYS, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (02) :578-588
[8]   Visual search: A retrospective [J].
Eckstein, Miguel P. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2011, 11 (05)
[10]   Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks [J].
Fischer, Rico ;
Plessow, Franziska .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6