共 50 条
Do hospital workers experience a higher risk of respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function?
被引:0
|作者:
Heibati, Behzad
[1
,2
,3
]
Jaakkola, Maritta S.
[1
,2
,3
]
Lajunen, Taina K.
[1
,2
,3
]
Ducatman, Alan
[4
]
Veysi, Rahmat
[5
]
Karimi, Ali
[6
]
Jaakkola, Jouni J. K.
[1
,2
,3
,7
]
机构:
[1] Univ Oulu, Fac Med, Ctr Environm & Resp Hlth Res, Aapistie 5B,POB 5000, Oulu 90014, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, Fac Med, Bioctr Oulu, POB 5000, Oulu 90014, Finland
[3] Univ Oulu, Oulu Univ Hosp, Med Res Ctr Oulu, POB 8000, Oulu 90014, Finland
[4] West Virginia Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[5] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth, Tehran, Iran
[7] Finnish Meteorol Inst, POB 503, Helsinki 00101, Finland
基金:
芬兰科学院;
关键词:
Occupational exposures;
Pulmonary function;
Respiratory symptoms;
Hospital workers;
HEALTH-CARE WORKERS;
AIR-POLLUTION;
PREVALENCE;
ASTHMA;
CALIFORNIA;
D O I:
10.1186/s12890-022-02098-5
中图分类号:
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background Hospital work environment contains various biological and chemical exposures that can affect indoor air quality and have impact on respiratory health of the staff. The objective of this study was to investigate potential effects of occupational exposures on the risk of respiratory symptoms and lung function in hospital work, and to evaluate potential interaction between smoking and occupational exposures. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of 228 staff members in a hospital and 228 employees of an office building as the reference group in Shiraz, Iran. All subjects completed a standardized ATS respiratory questionnaire and performed a spirometry test. Results In Poisson regression, the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) among the hospital staff were elevated for cough (aPR 1.90, 95% CI 1.15, 3.16), phlegm production (aPR 3.21, 95% CI 1.63, 6.32), productive cough (aPR 2.83, 95% CI 1.48, 5.43), wheezing (aPR 3.18, 95% CI 1.04, 9.66), shortness of breath (aPR 1.40, 95% CI 0.93, 2.12), and chest tightness (aPR 1.73, 95% CI 0.73, 4.12). Particularly laboratory personnel experienced increased risks of most symptoms. In linear regression adjusting for confounding, there were no significant differences in lung function between the hospital and office workers. There was an indication of synergism between hospital exposures and current smoking on FEV1/FVC% (interaction term beta = - 5.37, 95% CI - 10.27, - 0.47). Conclusions We present significant relations between hospital work, especially in laboratories, and increased risks of respiratory symptoms. Smoking appears to enhance these effects considerably. Our findings suggest that policymakers should implement evidence-based measures to prevent these occupational exposures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文