Establishment of a seismic topographic effect prediction model in the Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake area

被引:17
|
作者
Zhou, Hong [1 ]
Li, Jiting [1 ]
Chen, Xiaofei [2 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Site effects; Theoretical seismology; Wave propagation; SPECTRAL-ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND-MOTION; INCIDENT SH; SURFACE-TOPOGRAPHY; NOCERA UMBRA; LOS-ANGELES; SITE; AMPLIFICATION; WAVES; RIDGE;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggaa003
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The seismic topographic effect is one of the debated research topics in seismology and earthquake engineering. This debate is due to the discrepancy between the observed amplification and the amplification underestimation in numerical simulations. Although the numerical simulation of ground motion, which began in the 1970s, has been an important and effective way to study topographic effects, the quantitative mathematical model of topographic amplification is urgent. The actual influences on ground motion due to the topography depends on multiple topographic features, such as the topographic slope, topographic geometrical scale. To date, no definite conclusions regarding the main influencing factors and how to express the influencing factors have been made. In this paper, by introducing the back-propagation (BP) neural network technique, a set of mathematical parameters are determined to establish a quantitative topographic effect prediction model. These parameters are the elevation, the first gradient of the elevation and the higher order gradient in two orthogonal directions. Theoretically, the set of mathematical parameters is directly related to the simple topographic features, such as the elevation, topographic slope and height-to-width ratio. Furthermore, their combinations indirectly denote the complex topographic geometrical features, such as the different topographic geometrical scales, designated by the elevation (large-scale variable), the first gradient (middle-scale variable), the second-order gradient (small-scale variable) and so on (smaller scale variable), and the hill ridges that correspond to the sites with the first gradient of the elevation equal to zero and an elevation larger than its surrounding. In 2013, an earthquake of M-s 7.0 occurred in the Lushan area of Sichuan Province in Western China, where the topography sharply fluctuates. At station 51BXD, an acceleration was recorded close to 1.0 g, while at station 51BXM (14 km away from station 51BXD), the acceleration was recorded at only 0.2-0.3 g. In this paper, the spectral element method (SEM) is used to simulate the ground motion in the Lushan M-s 7.0 earthquake area. Then, the topographic amplification ratio of the simulated ground motion is calculated. Furthermore, a BP topographic amplification prediction model is established and compared based on different parameters. A rms of less than or close to 10 per cent between the BP model prediction results and topographic amplification ratio calculated using the simulated ground motion suggests that the parameters of the topographic elevation, the first gradient of the elevation and the second-order gradient in two orthogonal directions are enough to provide the acceptable topographic effect model in the Lushan area. Finally, using the prediction model, the topographic spectral ratio at stations 51BXD and 51BXM is predicted, and the topography amplification due to the scattering of seismic waves by the irregular topography at 51BXD is found to be 1.5-2 times that of 51BXM. The most important highlights of this paper identify the main factors of the topographic effect for the first time and provide an effective method for establishing a quantitative topographic effect prediction model.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 288
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pre-seismic and co-seismic deformation of Ms 7.0 earthquake in Lushan
    Yang, Guohua
    Zhu, Shuang
    Liang, Hongbao
    Yang, Bo
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40 (01): : 121 - 127
  • [2] Seismic damage to RC frame teaching buildings in Lushan MS7.0 earthquake
    Yan, Peilei, 1600, Chinese Society of Civil Engineering (47):
  • [3] Rupture process of the Ms 7.0 Lushan earthquake, 2013
    LIU ChengLi
    ZHENG Yong
    GE Can
    XIONG Xiong
    HSU HouTze
    ScienceChina(EarthSciences), 2013, 56 (07) : 1187 - 1192
  • [4] Stress modulation of the seismic gap between the 2008 Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake and the 2013 Ms 7.0 Lushan earthquake and implications for seismic hazard
    Guo, Rumeng
    Zheng, Yong
    Xu, Jianqiao
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 221 (03) : 2113 - 2125
  • [5] Directional seismic response to the complex topography: A case study of 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake
    Bo Zhao
    Yun-sheng Wang
    Li-jun Su
    Yong-hong Luo
    Jing Zhang
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2020, 17 : 2049 - 2067
  • [6] Directional seismic response to the complex topography: A case study of 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake
    ZHAO Bo
    WANG Yun-sheng
    SU Li-jun
    LUO Yong-hong
    ZHANG Jing
    JournalofMountainScience, 2020, 17 (09) : 2049 - 2067
  • [7] The Seismic Damage Investigation and Phenomenon Analysis of Space Grid Structures in Lushan Ms 7.0 Earthquake
    Xing Juehui
    Lu Ming
    Li Haiwang
    Zhao Yamin
    Yu Yan
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-4, 2014, 501-504 : 1535 - +
  • [8] Analysis of the Seismic Vulnerability of Buildings in the Lushan Ms7.0 Earthquake in the Sichuan Province of China
    Sun, Baitao
    Spencer, Billie F.
    Yan, Peilei
    Chen, Xiangzhao
    Zhang, Guixin
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (02) : 764 - 792
  • [9] Directional seismic response to the complex topography: A case study of 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake
    Zhao, Bo
    Wang, Yun-sheng
    Su, Li-jun
    Luo, Yong-hong
    Zhang, Jing
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2020, 17 (09) : 2049 - 2067
  • [10] Strong-Motion Observations of the 2017 Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake: Comparison with the 2013 Ms 7.0 Lushan Earthquake
    Ren, Yefei
    Wang, Hongwei
    Xu, Peibin
    Dhaka, Yadab P.
    Wen, Ruizhi
    Ma, Qiang
    Jiang, Peng
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 89 (04) : 1354 - 1365