Effect of fertilization with fermented bioslurry on sugar beet bulbs quality and yield

被引:0
|
作者
Slamka, Pavol [1 ]
Hanackova, Eva [1 ]
Candrakova, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovenska Polnohospodarska Univ Nitre, Fak Agrobiol & Potravinovych Zdrojov, Katedra Agrochem & Vyzivy Rastin, Nitra 94976, Slovakia
来源
LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE | 2007年 / 123卷 / 5-6期
关键词
fermented bioslurry (decayed waste); biogass; sugar beet; yield; quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
In three-year field experiment application of fermented bioslurry after biogass production as an organic fertilizer positively influenced the yield of sugar beet roots. Both the autumnal and the spring applications of fermented bioslurry increased the root yield in comparison with unfertilized control treatment. When comparing with farm-yard manure application treatment, spring application of bioslurry resulted in statistically significant increase of root yield, but with autumnal application there were no significant differences. In general, the highest yield increase was found out with spring bioslurry application. On the other side, the highest sugar content was determined at autumnal application, with the highest potassium content and lowest sodium content in roots on the average of three years. In spite of lower sugar content and raffinate extraction, spring application of fermented bioslurry provided the highest raffinate production of all treatments, particularly due to the highest root yield and lowest potassium and a-aminonitrogen content in roots of this treatment on the average of three experimental years. Use of bioslurry increased both quantity (root yield) and quality (raffinate production) of sugar beet by both the autumnual spring application. The achieved results were advanced in comparison with control treatment and in the case of spring application also in comparison with farm-yard application treatment. On the basis of achieved three-year results, this material can be recommended for sugar beet fertilization, especially in spring term.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 166
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of yield and sugar content of sugar beet bulbs on the theorethical ethanol and energy production at different fertilization
    Hanackova, Eva
    Zak, Stefan
    Macak, Milan
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2008, 124 (12): : 340 - 343
  • [2] INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SUGAR BEET ROOT YIELD AND QUALITY
    Kristek, Suzana
    Kristek, Andrija
    Evacic, Martin
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 371 - 374
  • [3] EFFECT OF THE FOLIAR BORON FERTILIZATION ON SUGAR BEET ROOT YIELD AND QUALITY
    Kristek, A.
    Stojic, Biserka
    Kristek, Suzana
    POLJOPRIVREDA, 2006, 12 (01):
  • [4] The effect of different soil cultivation and fertilization on yield, quality and uptake of nutrients in sugar beet
    Kovac, K
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1998, 44 (02): : 59 - 64
  • [5] EFFECT OF SULPHUR FERTILISATION ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET ROOTS
    Ryant, Pavel
    Antosovsky, Jiri
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2022, 138 (5-6): : 185 - 189
  • [6] Organic and inorganic fertilization influenced on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes
    Irshad Ahmad
    Bashir Ahmad
    Shahzad Ali
    Han Qing Fang
    Tiening Liu
    Muhammad Kamran
    Yang Wu
    Mati Ur Rahman
    Shah Faisal
    Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 42 (3-4) : 218 - 223
  • [7] Effect of stand density and nitrogen fertilization on the yield and quality of sugar beet seed
    Pospisil, M
    Mustapic, Z
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1999, 45 (07): : 305 - 309
  • [8] Yield and quality of sugar beet crown as well as leaf yield of different sugar beet varieties and a fodder beet
    Hoffmann, Christa
    ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2011, 136 (08): : 555 - 564
  • [9] Effect of soil potassium on yield and quality of diverse sugar beet genotypes
    Antunovic, M
    Rastija, D
    Pospisil, M
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 2002, 48 (09): : 418 - 423
  • [10] INFLUENCE OF FERTILIZATION ON THE NITRATE CONTENT, THEIR DYNAMICS IN SOIL AND ON SUGAR-BEET ROOT YIELD AND QUALITY
    DROPULIC, D
    TEKLIC, T
    LONCARIC, Z
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1995, 41 (03): : 135 - 140