The Curious Case of Threat-Awe: A Theoretical and Empirical Reconceptualization

被引:38
作者
Chaudhury, Srinwanti H. [1 ]
Garg, Nitika [2 ]
Jiang, Zixi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mkt, 3044 Quadrangle Bldg, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mkt, 3022 Quadrangle Bldg, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
threat-awe; fear; awe; emotion appraisals; mixed emotion; RISK TASK BART; POSITIVE EMOTIONS; AFFECT SYSTEM; APPRAISAL; EXPERIENCE; ATTITUDES; MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; RESPONSES; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1037/emo0000984
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Threat-based awe, or threat-awe, has been conceptualized as a fear-centric, negative-valenced variant of awe, although awe is a positive emotion embodying wonder and amazement. This research, however, argues that threat-awe is a mixed emotion rather than a negatively valenced subaspect of awe. We tested this conceptualization using two methodologies: (a) the theoretical framework of cognitive appraisals and (b) measures of ambivalence (an emotion co-occurrence index of bivalence, the Evaluative Space Grid, and a four-item scale to measure mixed emotions). Five studies (N = 1,140) compared threat-awe's appraisal profile and valence perceptions to univalenced, positive (awe, pride, happiness) and negative (fear) emotions. Research suggests that appraisal profiles of mixed emotions are close to their component emotions but distinct on certain appraisal dimensions. The empirical measures of valence demonstrate that threat-awe is felt as awe and fear in concert. Further, in terms of appraisals, threat-awe's appraisal profile is distinct from awe and fear on the dimensions of vastness, pleasantness, and situational control. Together, the two approaches-cognitive appraisals and measures of valence-provide convergent evidence that threat-awe is a mixed emotion. In conceptually clarifying threat-awe, we contribute to the nascent literature on mixed emotions.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1669
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Investigating goal conflict as a source of mixed emotions [J].
Berrios, Raul ;
Totterdell, Peter ;
Kellett, Stephen .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2015, 29 (04) :755-763
[3]   The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Gardner, WL ;
Berntson, GG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 76 (05) :839-855
[4]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATTITUDES AND EVALUATIVE SPACE - A CRITICAL-REVIEW, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE SEPARABILITY OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SUBSTRATES [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
BERNTSON, GG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 115 (03) :401-423
[5]   The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Berntson, GG .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (05) :133-137
[6]  
Cacioppo JT., 2012, Handbook of theories of social psychology, V1, P50, DOI [10.4135/9781446249215.n4, DOI 10.4135/9781446249215.N4]
[7]   Going Off Script: Effects of Awe on Memory for Script-Typical and -Irrelevant Narrative Detail [J].
Danvers, Alexander F. ;
Shiota, Michelle N. .
EMOTION, 2017, 17 (06) :938-952
[8]  
DIENER E, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V50, P1031, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.1031
[9]   INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES [J].
Dohmen, Thomas ;
Falk, Armin ;
Huffman, David ;
Sunde, Uwe ;
Schupp, Juergen ;
Wagner, Gert G. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2011, 9 (03) :522-550
[10]  
Donthu N, 1996, J ADVERTISING RES, V36, P69