The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States

被引:40
作者
Bakker, Victoria J. [1 ]
Baum, Julia K. [2 ]
Brodie, Jedediah F. [3 ]
Salomon, Anne K. [4 ]
Dickson, Brett G. [5 ]
Gibbs, Holly K. [6 ]
Jensen, Olaf P. [7 ]
McIntyre, Peter B. [8 ]
机构
[1] James Madison Univ, Dept Biol, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
[2] NCEAS, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[3] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Missoula, MT 59802 USA
[4] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Management, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[5] No Arizona Univ, Sch Earth Sci & Environm Sustainabil, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm Energy & Environm Bldg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Rutgers State Univ, Inst Marine & Coastal Sci, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Imnol 1, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Conservation funding; conservation investment; conservation NGOs; conservation science; economy; foundation; philanthropy; BIOLOGY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00125.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
To understand the changing role of funding sources in shaping conservation science in the United States, we analyzed acknowledgments from published studies, trends in research funding, and survey responses from conservation scientists. Although the U.S. federal government was the most frequently acknowledged source of support overall, U.S. foundations and NGOs were the predominant sources for tropical and socioeconomic research. Acknowledgments of foundation support for conservation research increased over the last two decades, while recognition of federal funds declined. Concordant trends in funding and acknowledgments indicated a changing landscape for conservation science, in which federal support has not kept pace with the growth in conservation research efforts or needs. Survey responses from conservation scientists about their funding sources were consistent with acknowledgment data, and most (64%) indicated that shifts in funding sources and amounts affected the type of research they conduct. Ongoing changes in the funding landscape shape the direction of conservation research and may make conservation science more vulnerable to economic recessions.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 444
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? [J].
Balmford, A ;
Whitten, T .
ORYX, 2003, 37 (02) :238-250
[2]  
*CBO, 2009, C US
[3]   The questionable effectiveness of science spending by international conservation organizations in the tropics [J].
Cleary, D .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :733-738
[4]   Who needs to spend money on conservation science anyway? [J].
Cleary, David .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) :1567-1568
[5]   Political and economic determinants of individuals' support for environmental spending [J].
Elliott, E ;
Seldon, BJ ;
Regens, JL .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (01) :15-27
[6]  
*FDN CTR, 2009, FDN YB FACTS FIG PRI
[7]  
*FDN CTR, 2000, TOP 50 US FDN AW GRA
[8]   Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing [J].
Giles, CL ;
Councill, IG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (51) :17599-17604
[9]   The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? [J].
Goldfarb, Brent .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (01) :41-58
[10]  
Higgins JV, 2006, CONSERV BIOL, V20, P1566, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00583_1.x