THE IMPACT OF DROUGHT STRESS ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF THREE STRAWBERRY VARIETIES IN DIFFERENT GROWING CONDITIONS

被引:0
作者
Nezhadahmadi, Arash [2 ]
Faruq, Golam [2 ]
Rashid, Kamaludin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Ctr Fdn Studies Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Fac Sci, Inst Biol Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
来源
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2015年 / 52卷 / 01期
关键词
Fragariaananassa; moisture content; chlorophyll content; leaf physiology; growing conditions; LEAF ANATOMY; WATER-STRESS; CULTIVARS; TOLERANCE; MAIZE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study was done to compare morphological and physiological responses of three strawberry varieties under water deficit conditions in controlled and natural environments. Plants of three strawberry varieties were grown in different soil moisture levels including 25% (severe stress), 50% (mild stress), and 75% (normal irrigation) and remained for 2 months as a duration of stress. It was observed that there were significant differences among varieties, drought stress regimes, environments, and duration of drought stress for different traits (P<0.05). Leaf area, total shoot length, leaf number, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll stability index, leaf expansion rate, and plant height were higher in natural condition compared to the protected environment under drought stress. These parameters were diminished significantly (P <= 0.05) under stress. Plants in natural condition produced thicker leaves than protected environment which indicated their higher resistance to drought condition. Severe stress (25%) reduced leaf thickness significantly compared toother drought treatments. Varieties cultivated in glasshouse condition produced higher leaf moisture under 25% of stress level. Leaf yield is one the most important traits which is related to fruit yield. Higher leaf yield leads to enhanced fruit yield. Plants showed higher performance in terms of leaf yield in natural environment compared to glasshouse. Leaf yield was higher under optimal soil moisture conditions, compared to 50% and 25% soil moisture levels in both environments. Fruit yield was higher in natural environment compared to glasshouse condition and plants showed lower fruit yield under stress conditions. Correlation analysis showed strong relationships among traits. In the two growing environments, leaf area and leaf thickness were significantly correlated (0.805**). A weak relationship was observed between chlorophyll stability index and chlorophyll content at significant level of 0.01 (0.297**). Relative leaf expansion rate had negative medium relationships with chlorophyll (-0.403**) and chlorophyll stability index (-0.291*). Significant relationships were seen between leaf yield and chlorophyll content (-0.537**), leaf yield and chlorophyll stability index (-0.374**), and leaf yield and relative leaf expansion rate (0.433**). Finally, fruit yield was significantly correlated with total shoot length (0.713**), leaf area (0.891**), plant height (0.661**), leaf thickness (0.561**), leaf number (0.509**), chlorophyll (0.440**), and leaf yield (0.801**). It is concluded that drought stress and the duration of stress had negative effects on different growth parameters. Moreover, plants cultivated in natural conditions were more capable of coping with stress compared to the plants grown in controlled environment.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 92
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of Drought Stress on Photosynthetic and Physiological Parameters of Tomato
    Liang, Guoting
    Liu, Junhui
    Zhang, Jingmin
    Guo, Jing
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2020, 145 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [32] Morphological, biochemical, and physiological responses of canola cultivars to drought stress
    Oskuei, B. Kazemi
    Bandehagh, A.
    Farajzadeh, D.
    Lajayer, B. Asgari
    Rajput, V. D.
    Astatkie, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (12) : 13551 - 13560
  • [33] EFFECTS OF DROUGHT STRESS ON TASSEL GROWTH AND CHARACTERISTICS PHYSIOLOGICAL OF MAIZE VARIETIES
    Li, J.
    Wang, T.
    Wang, C.
    Cui, R.
    Zhang, X.
    Feng, Q.
    Liu, S.
    Xie, Z.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 20 (01): : 685 - 697
  • [34] Synergetic effects of potassium and biochar on morphological, physiological, and biochemical attributes of maize crop grown under different levels of drought stress
    Rahman, Shafeeq Ur
    Han, Jing-Cheng
    Yasin, Ghulam
    Imtiaz, Muhammad Talha
    Zhao, Xu
    Alharbi, Sulaiman Ali
    Alfarraj, Saleh
    Alarfaj, Abdullah A.
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [35] Morpho-physiological Responses of Strawberry (Fragariaxananassa) to Exogenous Salicylic Acid Application under Drought Stress
    Ghaderi, N.
    Normohammadi, S.
    Javadi, T.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 17 (01): : 167 - 178
  • [36] Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Composition of Mulberry (Morus spp.) under Drought Stress
    Sun, Zhiyu
    Yin, You
    Zhu, Wenxu
    Zhou, Yongbin
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (05):
  • [37] Effect of Drought Stress and Seaweed Applications on Some Physiological Parameters in Echinacea (Echinacea purpurea L.)
    Bat, Mizgin
    Tuncturk, Ruveyde
    Tuncturk, Murat
    KSU TARIM VE DOGA DERGISI-KSU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURE, 2020, 23 (01): : 99 - 107
  • [38] PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSES OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA L.) VARIETIES AGAINST DROUGHT STRESS
    Kuru, I. B. R. A. H. I. M. SELcUK
    Isikalan, Cigdem
    AkbaS, Filiz
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2021, 50 (02): : 335 - 342
  • [39] Efficient Physiological and Nutrient Use Efficiency Responses of Maize Leaves to Drought Stress under Different Field Nitrogen Conditions
    Wang, Yang
    Huang, Yufang
    Fu, Wen
    Guo, Wenqing
    Ren, Ning
    Zhao, Yanan
    Ye, Youliang
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [40] Agronomic performances of three vetch species growing under different drought levels
    Haffani, Sywar
    Mezni, Majid
    Chaibi, Wided
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2014, 74 (03): : 263 - 272