Developing a strategic forensic science risk management system as a component of the forensic science system of systems

被引:3
作者
Wilson, L. E. [1 ,2 ]
Gahan, M. E. [2 ]
Lennard, C. [3 ]
Robertson, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Govt Dept Def, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, Fac Sci & Technol, NCFS, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Sci & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Forensic science; military; system of systems; critical system failure; sub-system; miscarriages of justice; FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION; ILLICIT DRUGS;
D O I
10.1080/00450618.2018.1510032
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Over the last decade, reviews of the forensic science industry have addressed critical system failures and made recommendations for improvements to the industry. These reviews identify systemic risks and issues but they do not explicitly address the need for strategic risk and issue management systems to deal with the identified issues and to mitigate risks. Risk and issue management, along with quality management systems, are critical components of the forensic science 'system of systems', which describes forensic science as a supporting system in the larger criminal justice, law enforcement, intelligence, and military systems. The update of ISO 17,025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories now includes a chapter on risk-based thinking. Furthermore, ISO 31,000 principle and guidelines for risk management was updated in 2018 and it is important for the forensic science industry to consider the updated ISO 17,025:2017 and ISO 31,000. In this paper, we discuss risk and issues management in relation to the forensic science system of systems. The purpose is to review the strategic risks identified in reviews of the forensic science industry to identify risk treatments to help to mitigate against critical system failure, such as miscarriages of justice.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 221
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality assurance in forensic science
    Levy, S
    Bergman, P
    Frank, A
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 1999, 4 (06) : 253 - 255
  • [22] Forensic Science: the truth is out there
    Herold, LD
    SMART NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION FOR HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, 2002, 4702 : 1 - 4
  • [23] Decision analysis in forensic science
    Taroni, F
    Bozza, S
    Aitken, C
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2005, 50 (04) : 894 - 905
  • [24] Importance of Forensic Science in Investigation
    Prasad, S. Anjana
    JOURNAL OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 766 - 773
  • [25] Forensic Science In Higher Education
    Kubecka, Karel
    Trawinska, Zuzana
    Fridrich, Jan
    4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON LEARNING TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP (WCLTA-2013), 2014, 141 : 753 - 757
  • [26] Registered reports in forensic science
    Houck, M. M.
    Chin, J.
    Swofford, H.
    Gibb, C.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (11):
  • [27] Traceology, criminalistics, and forensic science
    Ristenbatt, Ralph R., III
    Hietpas, Jack
    De Forest, Peter R.
    Margot, Pierre A.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [28] Forensic Science - A true profession?
    Robertson, James
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2011, 43 (2-3) : 105 - 122
  • [29] The scientific reinvention of forensic science
    Koehler, Jonathan J.
    Mnookin, Jennifer L.
    Saks, Michael J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (41)
  • [30] Drawbacks in the scientification of forensic science
    Biedermann, A.
    Curran, J.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 245 : E38 - E40