All downhill from the PhD? The typical impact trajectory of US academic careers

被引:10
作者
Thelwall, Mike [1 ]
Fairclough, Ruth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Wolverhampton, England
来源
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES | 2020年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
academic careers; career trajectory; citation analysis; MNLCS; United States; DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES; SCOPUS; GENDER; COLLABORATION; PRODUCTIVITY; SCIENCE; WEB; PERFORMANCE; ARTICLES; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1162/qss_a_00072
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Within academia, mature researchers tend to be more senior, but do they also tend to write higher impact articles? This article assesses long-term publishing (16+ years) United States (U.S.) researchers, contrasting them with shorter-term publishing researchers (1, 6, or 10 years). A long-term U.S. researcher is operationalized as having a first Scopus-indexed journal article in exactly 2001 and one in 2016-2019, with U.S. main affiliations in their first and last articles. Researchers publishing in large teams (11+ authors) were excluded. The average field and year normalized citation impact of long- and shorter-term U.S. researchers' journal articles decreases over time relative to the national average, with especially large falls for the last articles published, which may be at least partly due to a decline in self-citations. In many cases researchers start by publishing above U.S. average citation impact research and end by publishing below U.S. average citation impact research. Thus, research managers should not assume that senior researchers will usually write the highest impact papers.
引用
收藏
页码:1334 / 1348
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Does the Scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates [J].
Aman, Valeria .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 117 (02) :705-720
[2]   Academic careers and the valuation of academics. A discursive perspective on status categories and academic salaries in France as compared to the US, Germany and Great Britain [J].
Angermuller, Johannes .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 73 (06) :963-980
[3]   A Bibliometric Classificatory Approach for the Study and Assessment of Research Performance at the Individual Level: The Effects of Age on Productivity and Impact [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
van Leeuwen, Thed N. ;
Bordons, Maria .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (08) :1564-1581
[4]   Factors Influencing Fellowship Selection, Career Trajectory, and Academic Productivity among Plastic Surgeons [J].
DeLong, Michael R. ;
Hughes, Duncan B. ;
Tandon, Vickram J. ;
Choi, Bryan D. ;
Zenn, Michael R. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (03) :730-736
[5]   Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact [J].
Deville, Pierre ;
Wang, Dashun ;
Sinatra, Roberta ;
Song, Chaoming ;
Blondel, Vincent D. ;
Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
[6]  
Finkelstein MJ, 2015, CHANG ACAD, V14, P317, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16080-1_17
[7]   Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects and realities by gender and field [J].
Fox, MF ;
Stephan, PE .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2001, 31 (01) :109-122
[8]   The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns [J].
Gingras, Yves ;
Lariviere, Vincent ;
Macaluso, Benoit ;
Robitaille, Jean-Pierre .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (12)
[9]   The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers [J].
Gonzalez-Brambila, Claudia ;
Veloso, Francisco M. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (07) :1035-1051
[10]   Quantitative study on Australian academic science [J].
Gu, Xin ;
Blackmore, Karen .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 113 (02) :1009-1035