Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document - Effects on parents' understanding

被引:85
作者
Tait, AR [1 ]
Voepel-Lewis, T [1 ]
Malviya, SH [1 ]
Philipson, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Anesthesiol, Hlth Syst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE | 2005年 / 159卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.159.4.347
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine whether a consent document modified to conform with the federal guidelines for readability and processability would result in greater parental understanding compared with a standard form. Design: Randomized clinical study. Setting: The preoperative waiting area of a larger tertiary care children's hospital. Participants: A total of 305 parents of children scheduled for minor elective surgical procedures. Interventions: Parents were randomized to receive information about a clinical study in 1 of 4 ways: (1) standard consent form alone,(2) standard consent form with verbal disclosure, (3) modified form alone (standard form modified to meet the federal guidelines for readability and processability), and (4) modified form with verbal disclosure. Main Outcome Measures: Parents were interviewed to determine their understanding of 11 elements of consent, including study purpose, protocol, risks, benefits to child (direct), benefit to others (indirect), freedom to withdraw, alternatives, duration of study, voluntariness, confidentiality, and whom to contact. Their responses were scored by 2 independent assessors. Results: Understanding of the protocol, study duration, risks, and direct benefits, together with overall understanding, was greater among parents who received the modified form (P <.001). Additionally, parents reported that the modified form had greater clarity (P =.009) and improved layout compared with the standard form (P <.001). When parents were shown both forms, 81.2% preferred the modified version. Conclusions: Results suggest that a consent form written according to federal guidelines for readability and processability can improve parent understanding and thus will be important in enhancing the informed consent process.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 352
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   THE EFFICIENT ASSESSMENT OF NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE ;
KAO, CF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1984, 48 (03) :306-307
[2]  
COYNE C, 1995, J CANCER EDUC, V10, P12
[3]   Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: A study of the eastern cooperative oncology group [J].
Coyne, CA ;
Xu, RH ;
Raich, P ;
Plomer, K ;
Dignan, M ;
Wenzel, LB ;
Fairclough, D ;
Habermann, T ;
Schnell, L ;
Quella, S ;
Cella, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) :836-842
[4]  
Davis T C, 1993, Fam Med, V25, P391
[5]  
*DEP HHS, 1991, PROT HUM SUBJ
[6]   RESPONSES TO HYPOTHETICAL HIGH-RISK SITUATIONS - DO THEY PREDICT WEIGHT-LOSS IN A BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT PROGRAM OR THE CONTEXT OF DIETARY LAPSES [J].
DRAPKIN, RG ;
WING, RR ;
SHIFFMAN, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 14 (05) :427-434
[7]   ON THE READABILITY OF SURGICAL CONSENT FORMS [J].
GRUNDNER, TM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1980, 302 (16) :900-902
[8]   Informed consent and patient's rights documents: A right, a rite, or a rewrite? [J].
Hochhauser, M .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 1999, 9 (01) :1-20
[9]  
Hochhauser M, 2000, DRUG INF J, V34, P1309, DOI 10.1177/009286150003400438
[10]   Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions II [J].
Houts, PS ;
Witmer, JT ;
Egeth, HE ;
Loscalzo, MJ ;
Zabora, JR .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2001, 43 (03) :231-242