Wisdom of the CROUD: Development and validation of a patient-level prediction model for opioid use disorder using population-level claims data

被引:10
作者
Reps, Jenna Marie [1 ]
Cepeda, M. Soledad [1 ]
Ryan, Patrick B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Janssen Res & Dev Titusville, Titusville, NJ 08560 USA
关键词
COMMON DATA MODEL; ABUSE; DEPENDENCE; STATES; DRUG; RISK; TOOL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0228632
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Some patients who are given opioids for pain could develop opioid use disorder. If it was possible to identify patients who are at a higher risk of opioid use disorder, then clinicians could spend more time educating these patients about the risks. We develop and validate a model to predict a person's future risk of opioid use disorder at the point before being dispensed their first opioid. Methods A cohort study patient-level prediction using four US claims databases with target populations ranging between 343,552 and 384,424 patients. The outcome was recorded diagnosis of opioid abuse, dependency or unspecified drug abuse as a proxy for opioid use disorder from 1 day until 365 days after the first opioid is dispensed. We trained a regularized logistic regression using candidate predictors consisting of demographics and any conditions, drugs, procedures or visits prior to the first opioid. We then selected the top predictors and created a simple 8 variable score model. Results We estimated the percentage of new users of opioids with reported opioid use disorder within a year to range between 0.04%-0.26% across US claims data. We developed an 8 variable Calculator of Risk for Opioid Use Disorder (CROUD) score, derived from the prediction models to stratify patients into higher and lower risk groups. The 8 baseline variables were age 15-29, medical history of substance abuse, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, low back pain, renal impairment, painful neuropathy and recent ER visit. 1.8% of people were in the high risk group for opioid use disorder and had a score > = 23 with the model obtaining a sensitivity of 13%, specificity of 98% and PPV of 1.14% for predicting opioid use disorder. Conclusions CROUD could be used by clinicians to obtain personalized risk scores. CROUD could be used to further educate those at higher risk and to personalize new opioid dispensing guidelines such as urine testing. Due to the high false positive rate, it should not be used for contraindication or to restrict utilization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PRESCRIPTION DRUG US
[2]  
CDC, 2019, GUID PRESCR OP CHRON
[3]   A Tool to Assess Risk of De Novo Opioid Abuse or Dependence [J].
Ciesielski, Thomas ;
Iyengar, Reethi ;
Bothra, Amit ;
Tomala, Dave ;
Cislo, Geoffrey ;
Gage, Brian F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 129 (07) :699-+
[4]  
Dufour R, 2014, AM J PHARM BENEFIST, V6, P208
[5]   Risks for opioid abuse and dependence among recipients of chronic opioid therapy: Results from the TROUP Study [J].
Edlund, Mark J. ;
Martin, Bradley C. ;
Fan, Ming-Yu ;
Devries, Andrea ;
Braden, Jennifer B. ;
Sullivan, Mark D. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2010, 112 (1-2) :90-98
[6]   Identification of Opioid Abuse or Dependence: No Tool Is Perfect [J].
Goyal, Hemant ;
Singla, Umesh ;
Grimsley, Edwin W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 130 (03) :E113-E113
[7]   Prescription opioid abuse based on representative postmortem toxicology [J].
Hakkinen, Margareeta ;
Vuori, Erkki ;
Ojanpera, Ilkka .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 245 :121-125
[8]  
Heron Melonie, 2017, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V66, P1
[9]   Characterizing treatment pathways at scale using the OHDSI network [J].
Hripcsak, George ;
Ryan, Patrick B. ;
Duke, Jon D. ;
Shah, Nigam H. ;
Park, Rae Woong ;
Huser, Vojtech ;
Suchard, Marc A. ;
Schuemie, Martijn J. ;
DeFalco, Frank J. ;
Perotte, Adler ;
Banda, Juan M. ;
Reich, Christian G. ;
Schilling, Lisa M. ;
Matheny, Michael E. ;
Meeker, Daniella ;
Pratt, Nicole ;
Madigan, David .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (27) :7329-7336
[10]  
IBM Watson Health, 2019, IBM MARKETSCAN RES D