Research Methods Tutor: Evaluation of a dialogue-based tutoring system in the classroom

被引:25
作者
Arnott, Elizabeth [1 ]
Hastings, Peter [2 ]
Allbritton, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Chicago State Univ, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60628 USA
[2] Depaul Univ, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
关键词
Latent Semantic Analysis; Presentation Mode; Posttest Score; Intelligent Tutoring System; Instructional Condition;
D O I
10.3758/BRM.40.3.694
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Research Methods Tutor (RMT) is a dialogue-based intelligent tutoring system for use in conjunction with undergraduate psychology research methods courses. RMT includes five topics that correspond to the curriculum of introductory research methods courses: ethics, variables, reliability, validity, and experimental design. We evaluated the effectiveness of the RMT system in the classroom using a nonequivalent control group design. Students in three classes (n = 83) used RMT, and students in two classes (n = 53) did not use RMT. Results indicated that the use of RMT yielded strong learning gains of 0.75 standard deviations above classroom instruction alone. Further, the dialogue-based tutoring condition of the system resulted in higher gains than did the textbook-style condition (CAI version) of the system. Future directions for RMT include the addition of new topics and tutoring elements.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 698
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Corbett, AT ;
Koedinger, KR ;
Pelletier, R .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 1995, 4 (02) :167-207
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Computer assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems: Establishing communication and collaboration
[4]  
Bloom B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of Educ. Objectives: The Classification of Educ.Goals: Handbook I: Cogn. Domain, V20, P24, DOI DOI 10.1300/J104V03N01_03
[5]  
BLOOM BS, 1984, EDUC RES, V13, P4, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X013006004
[6]  
Chi MTH, 2001, COGNITIVE SCI, V25, P471, DOI 10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00044-1
[7]  
CORBETT AT, 1991, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[8]  
Graesser AC, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, PTS 1 AND 2, P474
[9]   COLLABORATIVE DIALOGUE PATTERNS IN NATURALISTIC ONE-TO-ONE TUTORING [J].
GRAESSER, AC ;
PERSON, NK ;
MAGLIANO, JP .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 9 (06) :495-522
[10]  
Koedinger KR., 1997, INT J ARTIFICIAL INT, V8, P30, DOI DOI 10.1007/s40593-015-0082-8