Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET

被引:269
作者
Tixier, Florent [1 ,2 ]
Hatt, Mathieu [1 ]
Le Rest, Catherine Cheze [1 ]
Le Pogam, Adrien [1 ]
Corcos, Laurent [2 ]
Visvikis, Dimitris [1 ]
机构
[1] CHRU Morvan, LaTIM, INSERM, UMR1101, F-29609 Brest, France
[2] Fac Med, INSERM, UMR1078, Brest, France
关键词
PET; F-18-FDG; texture analysis; reproducibility; oncology; EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; VOLUME MEASUREMENTS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; FDG PET; CANCER; VARIABILITY; IMAGES;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.111.099127
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
F-18-FDG PET measurement of standardized uptake value (SUV) is increasingly used for monitoring therapy response and predicting outcome. Alternative parameters computed through textural analysis were recently proposed to quantify the heterogeneity of tracer uptake by tumors as a significant predictor of response. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of these heterogeneity measurements. Methods: Double baseline F-18-FDG PET scans were acquired within 4 d of each other for 16 patients before any treatment was considered. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed on 8 parameters based on histogram measurements and 17 parameters based on textural heterogeneity features after discretization with values between 8 and 128. Results: The reproducibility of maximum and mean SUV was similar to that in previously reported studies, with a mean percentage difference of 4.7% +/- 19.5% and 5.5% +/- 21.2%, respectively. By comparison, better reproducibility was measured for some textural features describing local heterogeneity of tracer uptake, such as entropy and homogeneity, with a mean percentage difference of -2% +/- 5.4% and 1.8% +/- 11.5%, respectively. Several regional heterogeneity parameters such as variability in the intensity and size of regions of homogeneous activity distribution had reproducibility similar to that of SUV measurements, with 95% confidence intervals of -22.5% to 3.1% and -1.1% to 23.5%, respectively. These parameters were largely insensitive to the discretization range. Conclusion: Several parameters derived from textural analysis describing heterogeneity of tracer uptake by tumors on local and regional scales had reproducibility similar to or better than that of simple SUV measurements. These reproducibility results suggest that these F-18-FDG PET-derived parameters, which have already been shown to have predictive and prognostic value in certain cancer models, may be used to monitor therapy response and predict patient outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 700
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Evolving role of molecular imaging with PET in detecting and characterizing heterogeneity of cancer tissue at the primary and metastatic sites, a plausible explanation for failed attempts to cure malignant disorders
    Basu, Sandip
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    Gatenby, Robert
    Saboury, Babak
    Torigian, Drew A.
    Alavi, Abass
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (06) : 987 - 991
  • [2] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [3] A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihoods in emission tomography
    Browne, J
    DePierro, AR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (05) : 687 - 699
  • [4] Pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET quantitative parameters help in predicting the response to radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma
    Cazaentre, Thomas
    Morschhauser, Franck
    Vermandel, Maximilien
    Betrouni, Nacim
    Prangere, Thierry
    Steinling, Marc
    Huglo, Damien
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (03) : 494 - 504
  • [5] Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes
    El Naqa, I.
    Grigsby, P. W.
    Apte, A.
    Kidd, E.
    Donnelly, E.
    Khullar, D.
    Chaudhari, S.
    Yang, D.
    Schmitt, M.
    Laforest, Richard
    Thorstad, W. L.
    Deasy, J. O.
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2009, 42 (06) : 1162 - 1171
  • [6] Repeatability of Metabolically Active Volume Measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Frings, Virginie
    de Langen, Adrianus J.
    Smit, Egbert F.
    van Velden, Floris H. P.
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    van Tinteren, Harm
    Boellaard, Ronald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (12) : 1870 - 1877
  • [7] Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters
    Galavis, Paulina E.
    Hollensen, Christian
    Jallow, Ngoneh
    Paliwal, Bhudatt
    Jeraj, Robert
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2010, 49 (07) : 1012 - 1016
  • [8] TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
    HARALICK, RM
    SHANMUGAM, K
    DINSTEIN, I
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1973, SMC3 (06): : 610 - 621
  • [9] Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    Albarghach, Nidal M.
    Tixier, Florent
    Pradier, Olivier
    Cheze-le Rest, Catherine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (07) : 1191 - 1202
  • [10] Reproducibility of 18F-FDG and 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-Fluorothymidine PET Tumor Volume Measurements
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Rest, Catherine Cheze-Le
    Aboagye, Eric O.
    Kenny, Laura M.
    Rosso, Lula
    Turkheimer, Federico E.
    Albarghach, Nidal M.
    Metges, Jean-Philippe
    Pradier, Olivier
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (09) : 1368 - 1376