Probing the politics of comprehensive sexuality education: 'Universality' versus 'Cultural Sensitivity': a Dutch-Bangladeshi collaboration on adolescent sexuality education

被引:30
作者
Roodsaz, Rahil [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Gender Studies, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
SEX EDUCATION-SEXUALITY SOCIETY AND LEARNING | 2018年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
Comprehensive sexuality education; sexual and reproductive health and rights; development aid; Bangladesh; cultural sensitivity; SEX-EDUCATION; GENDER; RELIGION; AGENCY; WORLD;
D O I
10.1080/14681811.2017.1403894
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As part of Western European development aid policy, comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is increasingly promoted in resource-poor countries. This paper engages with CSE promotion in Bangladesh funded by the Dutch Government. It unpacks the 'collaboration' by looking at how a paradox is played out between the universal ideals underlying a broader transnational rights-approach and the intended cultural sensitivity by adapting CSE to the targeted context. Feminist scholarship on the ideological, moral and affective underpinnings of CSE is used to question this model's implied universality and neutrality. The various negotiations, concerns and strategies of NGO-representatives as co-producers of sexuality knowledge in Bangladesh are focused upon. Analysis focuses on how a 'speakable', middle-class-oriented 'proper' sexuality is invented and managed through affect; how cultural insensitivity and secular normativity with respect to CSE are challenged in discussions concerned a rights-versus-health approach; and how a confident and knowledgeable adolescent or young person is imagined through the emancipatory project attributed to sexuality education. Rather than via equal collaboration, it is argued, adolescent sexuality education in these development aid settings is shaped by powerful transnational and local processes of Othering.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 121
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Addison N., 2006, Sex Education, V6, P351, DOI [10.1080/14681810600981855, DOI 10.1080/14681810600981855]
[2]  
Aggleton P., 2004, J PSYCHOL HUMAN SEXU, V16, P1
[3]  
Ahmed S., 2017, LIVING FEMINIST LIFE, DOI [10.1215/9780822373377, DOI 10.1215/9780822373377]
[4]  
[Anonymous], HIST SEXUALITY INTRO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, FORMATIONS SECULAR C
[6]   Doing religion in a secular world: Women in conservative religions and the question of agency [J].
Avishai, Orit .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 2008, 22 (04) :409-433
[7]  
Bay-Cheng L. Y., 2003, SEX EDUC-SEX SOC LEA, V3, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1468181032000052162, https://doi.org/10.1080/1468181032000052162]
[8]   Conjugating the Modern/Religious, Conceptualizing Female Religious Agency Contours of a 'Post-secular' Conjuncture [J].
Bracke, Sarah .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2008, 25 (06) :51-67
[9]   Comprehensive sexuality education, culture and gender: the effect of the cultural setting on a sexuality education programme in Ethiopia [J].
Browes, Natalie C. .
SEX EDUCATION-SEXUALITY SOCIETY AND LEARNING, 2015, 15 (06) :655-670
[10]  
Butler J., 1990, GENDER TROUBLE FEMIN