IPRS: Leveraging Gene-Environment Interaction to Reconstruct Polygenic Risk Score

被引:7
作者
Tang, Yingdan [1 ]
You, Dongfang [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Honggang [1 ]
Yang, Sheng [1 ]
Zhao, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Lab Biomed Big Data, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Ctr Biomed Big Data, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Personalized Med, Jiangsu Key Lab Canc Biomarkers Prevent & Treatme, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
polygenic risk score; gene-environment interaction; genome-wide association analysis; prediction model; risk stratification; MISSING HERITABILITY; LUNG;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2022.801397
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Polygenic risk score (PRS) is widely regarded as a predictor of genetic susceptibility to disease, applied to individuals to predict the risk of disease occurrence. When the gene-environment (GxE) interaction is considered, the traditional PRS prediction model directly uses PRS to interact with the environment without considering the interactions between each variant and environment, which may lead to prediction performance and risk stratification of complex diseases are not promising.Methods: We developed a method called interaction PRS (iPRS), reconstructing PRS by leveraging GxE interactions. Two extensive simulations evaluated prediction performance, risk stratification, and calibration performance of the iPRS prediction model, and compared it with the traditional PRS prediction model. Real data analysis was performed using existing data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial study to predict genetic susceptibility, pack-years of smoking history, and GxE interactions in patients with lung cancer.Results: Two extensive simulations indicated iPRS prediction model could improve the prediction performance of disease risk, the accuracy of risk stratification, and clinical calibration performance compared with the traditional PRS prediction model, especially when antagonism accounted for the majority of the interaction. PLCO real data analysis also suggested that the iPRS prediction model was superior to the PRS prediction model in predictive effect (p = 0.0205).Conclusion: IPRS prediction model could have a good application prospect in predicting disease risk, optimizing the screening of high-risk populations, and improving the clinical benefits of preventive interventions among populations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gene-environment interaction between adiponectin gene polymorphisms and environmental factors on the risk of diabetic retinopathy
    Li, Yuan
    Wu, Qun Hong
    Jiao, Ming Li
    Fan, Xiao Hong
    Hu, Quan
    Hao, Yan Hua
    Liu, Ruo Hong
    Zhang, Wei
    Cui, Yu
    Han, Li Yuan
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2015, 6 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [22] A Likelihood Ratio Test for Gene-Environment Interaction Based on the Trend Effect of Genotype Under an Additive Risk Model Using the Gene-Environment Independence Assumption
    de Rochemonteix, Matthieu
    Napolioni, Valerio
    Sanyal, Nilotpal
    Belloy, Michael E.
    Caporaso, Neil E.
    Landi, Maria T.
    Greicius, Michael D.
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    Han, Summer S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 190 (01) : 129 - 141
  • [23] Rank Concordance of Polygenic Indices: Implications for Personalised Intervention and Gene-Environment Interplay
    Muslimova, Dilnoza
    Pereira, Rita Dias
    Von Hinke, Stephanie
    Van Kippersluis, Hans
    Rietveld, Niels
    Meddens, Fleur
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2022, 52 (06) : 381 - 381
  • [24] Efficient designs of gene-environment interaction studies: implications of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and gene-environment independence
    Chen, Jinbo
    Kang, Guolian
    VanderWeele, Tyler
    Zhang, Cuilin
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (22) : 2516 - 2530
  • [25] Review of Statistical Methods for Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis
    Summer S. Han
    Nilanjan Chatterjee
    Current Epidemiology Reports, 2018, 5 : 39 - 45
  • [26] MAOA and Aggression: A Gene-Environment Interaction in Two Populations
    McDermott, Rose
    Dawes, Chris
    Prom-Wormley, Elizabeth
    Eaves, Lindon
    Hatemi, Peter K.
    JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2013, 57 (06) : 1043 - 1064
  • [27] GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION: A GENETIC-EPIDEMIOLOGICAL APPROACH
    Pekmezovic, Tatjana
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 29 (03) : 131 - 134
  • [28] Exploiting gene-environment interaction to detect genetic associations
    Kraft, Peter
    Yen, Yu-Chun
    Stram, Daniel O.
    Morrison, John
    Gauderman, W. James
    HUMAN HEREDITY, 2007, 63 (02) : 111 - 119
  • [29] Unveiling challenges in Mendelian randomization for gene-environment interaction
    Gorfine, Malka
    Qu, Conghui
    Peters, Ulrike
    Hsu, Li
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 48 (04) : 164 - 189
  • [30] Modelling gene-environment interaction in first episodes of psychosis
    Bernardo, Miguel
    Bioque, Miquel
    Cabrera, Bibiana
    Lobo, Antonio
    Gonzalez-Pinto, Ana
    Pina, Laura
    Corripio, Iluminada
    Sanjuan, Julio
    Mane, Anna
    Castro-Fornieles, Josefina
    Vieta, Eduard
    Arango, Celso
    Mezquida, Gisela
    Gasso, Patricia
    Parellada, Mara
    Saiz-Ruiz, Jeronimo
    Cuesta, Manuel J.
    Mas, Sergi
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2017, 189 : 181 - 189