Glycemic and insulinemic responses to breakfast and succeeding second meal in type 2 diabetics

被引:4
作者
Hettiaratchi, U. P. K. [1 ]
Ekanayake, Sagarika [1 ]
Welihinda, Jayantha [2 ]
Perera, M. S. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Dept Biochem, Fac Med Sci, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
[2] Univ Colombo, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Fac Med, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[3] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Dept Family Med, Fac Med Sci, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Glycemic index; insulinemic index; Type 2 diabetic patients; Second meal effect; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS; INDEX; CARBOHYDRATE; PREVALENCE; LOAD; HYPERINSULINEMIA; PROJECTIONS; PROTEIN; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s13410-011-0044-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to determine the parameters related to glycemic and insulinemic responses of type 2 diabetic patients to three low Glycemic Index (GI) breakfast meals and study the effects of each breakfast meal on a standard lunch meal. Breakfast meals were boiled chickpea, red rice (AT 353) meal and atta roti and the standard lunch was red rice (AT 353) with accompaniments. Study design was random cross over (n = 11 age: 40-62 year). GI and Insulinemic Indices (II) of breakfast meals were calculated with white bread as the standard. Serum glucose peak concentration of chickpea was significantly lower than rice (p = 0.0321), roti (p = 0.0019) and bread (p = 0.0001). GI of chickpea, rice and roti meals were 40 +/- 7, 64 +/- 11 and 88 +/- 9 respectively. GI of chickpea was significantly lower than rice (p = 0.0466) and atta roti (p = 0.0016) meals. Chickpea and rice breakfast meals had low GI and atta roti medium GI. GI values in diabetic patients were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from that obtained previously in the same laboratory in healthy individuals. II of chickpea, rice and roti were 76 +/- 13, 90 +/- 20, 115 +/- 28. Glycemic and insulinemic responses showed a linear positive relationship (r = 0.984) indicating that low GI was due to the macronutrients present in the meals. Breakfast meals given in the present study did not lower Glycemic nor insulinemic responses of the subsequent lunch meals. These data are useful especially in primary patient care for modulating diets of diabetic patients.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Arvidsson-Lenner R., 2004, Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition, V48, P84, DOI 10.1080/11026480410033999
  • [2] International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values: 2008
    Atkinson, Fiona S.
    Foster-Powell, Kaye
    Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (12) : 2281 - 2283
  • [3] Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk - a metaanalysis of observational studies
    Barclay, Alan W.
    Petocz, Peter
    McMillan-Price, Joanna
    Flood, Victoria M.
    Prvan, Tania
    Mitchell, Paul
    Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 87 (03) : 627 - 637
  • [4] Glycemic index, glycemic load, and glycemic response are not the same
    Barclay, AW
    Brand-Miller, JC
    Wolever, TMS
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (07) : 1839 - 1840
  • [5] Beals K. A., 2005, SPECIAL PUBLICATION
  • [6] Glycaemic index concept and metabolic diseases
    Bornet, FRJ
    Billaux, MS
    Messing, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 1997, 21 (1-2) : 207 - 219
  • [7] Glycaemic index methodology
    Brouns, F
    Bjorck, I
    Frayn, KN
    Gibbs, AL
    Lang, V
    Slama, G
    Wolever, TMS
    [J]. NUTRITION RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2005, 18 (01) : 145 - 171
  • [8] Preventing diabetes in south Asians - Too little action and too late
    Chowdhury, TA
    Grace, C
    Kopelman, PG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7423): : 1059 - 1060
  • [9] Effects of breakfast meal composition on second meal metabolic responses in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Clark, C. A.
    Gardiner, J.
    McBurney, M. I.
    Anderson, S.
    Weatherspoon, L. J.
    Henry, D. N.
    Hord, N. G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2006, 60 (09) : 1122 - 1129
  • [10] [FAO WHO], 1998, FAO FOOD NUTR PAP, V6, P1