Using semi-Markov processes to study timeliness and tests used in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast cancer

被引:4
作者
Hubbard, R. A. [1 ]
Lange, J. [2 ]
Zhang, Y. [3 ]
Salim, B. A. [4 ]
Stroud, J. R. [5 ]
Inoue, L. Y. T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC USA
关键词
cancer; mammography; multistate model; semi-Markov model; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; WORK-UP; MODELS; DISTRIBUTIONS; HAZARDS; WOMEN; HISTORY; PACKAGE; STROKE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7055
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast cancer due to abnormal screening mammography results is common, creates anxiety for women and is costly for the healthcare system. Timely evaluation with minimal use of additional diagnostic testing is key to minimizing anxiety and cost. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian semi-Markov model that allows for flexible, semi-parametric specification of the sojourn time distributions and apply our model to an investigation of the process of diagnostic evaluation with mammography, ultrasound and biopsy following an abnormal screening mammogram. We also investigate risk factors associated with the sojourn time between diagnostic tests. By utilizing semi-Markov processes, we expand on prior work that described the timing of the first test received by providing additional information such as the mean time to resolution and proportion of women with unresolved mammograms after 90 days for women requiring different sequences of tests in order to reach a definitive diagnosis. Overall, we found that older women were more likely to have unresolved positive mammograms after 90 days. Differences in the timing of imaging evaluation and biopsy were generally on the order of days and thus did not represent clinically important differences in diagnostic delay. Copyright (C) 2016 JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4980 / 4993
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[2]   The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review [J].
Brett, J ;
Bankhead, C ;
Henderson, B ;
Watson, E ;
Austoker, J .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (11) :917-938
[3]   hsmm - An R package for analyzing hidden semi-Markov models [J].
Bulla, Jan ;
Bulla, Ingo ;
Nenadic, Oleg .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2010, 54 (03) :611-619
[4]   Bayesian semiparametric modeling of survival data based on mixtures of B-spline distributions [J].
Cai, Bo ;
Meyer, Renate .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2011, 55 (03) :1260-1272
[5]  
Cao Qi, 2014, 36 ANN M SOC MED DEC
[6]   Hierarchical proportional hazards regression models for highly stratified data [J].
Carlin, BP ;
Hodges, JS .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (04) :1162-1170
[7]   Likelihood of additional work-up among women undergoing routine screening mammography: the impact of age, breast density, and hormone therapy use [J].
Carney, PA ;
Kasales, CJ ;
Tosteson, ANA ;
Weiss, JE ;
Goodrich, ME ;
Poplack, SP ;
Wells, WS ;
Titus-Ernstoff, L .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 39 (01) :48-55
[8]   Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography [J].
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Abraham, Linn A. ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. ;
Yabroff, K. Robin ;
Sickles, Edward A. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Kasales, Claudia J. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Rosenberg, Robert D. ;
Dignan, Mark B. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (02) :385-392
[9]  
Crystal S, 1999, HEALTH SERV RES, V33, P1611
[10]  
Diaconis P, 1985, QUANTIFYING PRIOR OP, V2