The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia

被引:66
作者
Hill, Michella G. [1 ]
Sim, Moira [1 ]
Mills, Brennen [1 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Mobile applications; Diagnosis; Signs and symptoms; Internet; eHealth;
D O I
10.5694/mja2.50600
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate the quality of diagnostic and triage advice provided by free website and mobile application symptom checkers (SCs) accessible in Australia. Design 36 SCs providing medical diagnosis or triage advice were tested with 48 medical condition vignettes (1170 diagnosis vignette tests, 688 triage vignette tests). Main outcome measures Correct diagnosis advice (provided in first, the top three or top ten diagnosis results); correct triage advice (appropriate triage category recommended). Results The 27 diagnostic SCs listed the correct diagnosis first in 421 of 1170 SC vignette tests (36%; 95% CI, 31-42%), among the top three results in 606 tests (52%; 95% CI, 47-59%), and among the top ten results in 681 tests (58%; 95% CI, 53-65%). SCs using artificial intelligence algorithms listed the correct diagnosis first in 46% of tests (95% CI, 40-57%), compared with 32% (95% CI, 26-38%) for other SCs. The mean rate of first correct results for individual SCs ranged between 12% and 61%. The 19 triage SCs provided correct advice for 338 of 688 vignette tests (49%; 95% CI, 44-54%). Appropriate triage advice was more frequent for emergency care (63%; 95% CI, 52-71%) and urgent care vignette tests (56%; 95% CI, 52-75%) than for non-urgent care (30%; 95% CI, 11-39%) and self-care tests (40%; 95% CI, 26-49%). Conclusion The quality of diagnostic advice varied between SCs, and triage advice was generally risk-averse, often recommending more urgent care than appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 519
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018, 8146 0 HOUS US INF T
  • [2] Australian Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration, REG SOFTW MED DEV
  • [3] Australian Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration, AUSTR REG GUID MED D
  • [4] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2017, AUSTR I HLTH WELF HL, V80
  • [5] Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations
    Boudreaux, Edwin D.
    Waring, Molly E.
    Hayes, Rashelle B.
    Sadasivam, Rajani S.
    Mullen, Sean
    Pagoto, Sherry
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 4 (04) : 363 - 371
  • [6] Britt H, 2016, GEN PRACTICE SERIES, V41
  • [7] Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information
    Cheng, Christina
    Dunn, Matthew
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 39 (04) : 309 - 314
  • [8] Dr Google in the ED: searching for online health information by adult emergency department patients
    Cocco, Anthony M.
    Zordan, Rachel
    Taylor, David McD
    Weiland, Tracey J.
    Dilley, Stuart J.
    Kant, Joyce
    Dombagolla, Mahesha
    Hendarto, Andreas
    Lai, Fiona
    Hutton, Jennie
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2018, 209 (08) : 342 - 347
  • [9] Cooke G, 2013, AUST FAM PHYSICIAN, V42, P65
  • [10] Deloitte Australia, MOB CONS SURV 2018 A