Environmental analysis of mining operations: Dynamic tools for impact assessment

被引:22
作者
Castilla-Gomez, Jorge [1 ]
Herrera-Herbert, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Madrid UPM, Madrid Sch Mines, Dept Min & Underground Excavat, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA); Mining; Dynamic model; Environmental effects; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mineng.2014.10.024
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Keeping a high mineral production rate while protecting the environment requires a mining framework where several perspectives are considered and weighed up. The concept of sustainability provides just such a framework. Social and financial needs determine mineral production rates, resulting in a global demand for minerals. To ensure effective environmental protection, different tools and techniques have been developed. One of the most widespread is the so-called Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This technique is extremely useful but there are also drawbacks. For instance, subjectivity in initial value choices makes model comparison difficult. To overcome some of these problems, this paper sets out a methodology to establish an environmental analysis, focusing on the evolution of environmental impacts over time. This analysis provides a dynamic tool which could be included as part of any EIA-based techniques. The proposed methodology is general enough to apply to different mine project designs since the model includes a typical mining operation layout together with adaptive parameters. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 96
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A Rich Vein? Mining and the Pursuit of Sustainability [J].
Amezaga, Jaime M. ;
Roetting, Tobias S. ;
Younger, Paul L. ;
Nairn, Robert W. ;
Noles, Anthony-Jo ;
Oyarzun, Ricardo ;
Quintanilla, Jorge .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (01) :21-26
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, CONS CUM EFF NAT ENV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SME MINING ENG HDB
[4]   Assessing the cumulative effects of projects using geographic information systems [J].
Atkinson, Samuel F. ;
Canter, Larry W. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (05) :457-464
[5]   UK and Italian EIA systems: A comparative study on management practice and performance in the construction industry [J].
Bassi, Andrea ;
Howard, Robert ;
Geneletti, Davide ;
Ferrari, Simone .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 34 :1-11
[6]   Informal knowledge processes: the underpinning for sustainability outcomes in EIA? [J].
Bond, Alan J. ;
Viegas, Claudia V. ;
de Souza Reinisch Coelho, Christianne Coelho ;
Selig, Paulo Mauricio .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (01) :6-13
[7]  
Castilla-Gomez J., 2014, P 22 MPES C DRESD GE, P685, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-02678-7_66, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02678-7_66]
[8]  
Christmann P., 2007, Minerals & Energy-Raw Materials Report, V22, P88
[9]   Canadian and international EIA frameworks as they apply to cumulative effects [J].
Connelly, Robert .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (05) :453-456
[10]  
Cooper L.M., 2002, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V22, P415