Predictors of Osteoporosis Screening Completion Rates in a Primary Care Practice

被引:10
作者
DeJesus, Ramona S. [1 ]
Chaudhry, Rajeev [1 ]
Angstman, Kurt B. [2 ]
Cha, Stephen S. [3 ]
Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M. [1 ]
Kesman, Rebecca L. [1 ]
Bernard, Matthew E. [2 ]
Stroebel, Robert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Primary Care Internal Med, Ctr Innovat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Family Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN;
D O I
10.1089/pop.2010.0057
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The United States Preventive Services Task Force and the National Osteoporosis Foundation recommend routine osteoporosis screening for women aged 65 years or older. Previous studies have shown that the use of a clinical decision-support tool significantly improves screening rates. In a recently published study, a statistically significant improvement was found in the screening rates for eligible women with use of the tool. To evaluate whether a clinical decision-support tool independently predicts completion of osteoporosis screening tests and to identify predictors of screening completion, we examined the records of 2462 female patients who were eligible for osteoporosis screening but had no prior baseline screening and who were seen in our primary care practices in 2007 and 2008. Patient and provider characteristics and clinic visit type were identified, and their association with screening test completion was statistically analyzed using both univariate and multivariate models. Screening completion rates increased significantly from 2007 to 2008. Factors associated with increased likelihood of screening completion included race, marital status, residence, presence of comorbidity (cancer, rheumatologic disease), and the year and type of visit. Screening was less likely for women aged 80 years or older. The use of a point-of-care decision-support tool not only improved osteoporosis screening rates significantly but appeared to be an independent predictor of screening completion. It potentially can facilitate the systematic and effective delivery of preventive health services to patients in the primary care setting. (Population Health Management 2011;14:243-247)
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 247
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CLIN GUID PREV TREAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A report of the Surgeon General
[3]   Predictors of falls among postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) [J].
Barrett-Connor, E. ;
Weiss, T. W. ;
McHorney, C. A. ;
Miller, P. D. ;
Siris, E. S. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 20 (05) :715-722
[4]   Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: Recommendations and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, PS ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (06) :526-528
[5]   Osteoporosis: Evaluation of Screening Patterns in a Primary-Care Group Practice [J].
Cohen, Kenneth ;
Maier, Diana .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2008, 11 (04) :498-502
[6]  
DeJesus RS, J EVAL CLIN PRACT, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2573.2010.01528.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2573.2010.01528.X]
[7]  
Eaton J, J EVAL CLIN IN PRESS
[8]   Missed opportunities for prevention of osteoporotic fracture [J].
Gallagher, TC ;
Geling, O ;
Comite, F .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (04) :450-456
[9]   Clinical Decision Support Tools for Osteoporosis Disease Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Kastner, Monika ;
Straus, Sharon E. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (12) :2095-2105
[10]   HIGH-RISK PATIENTS' READINESS TO UNDERGO BMD TESTING FOR OSTEOPOROSIS DIAGNOSIS IN PENNSYLVANIA [J].
Polinski, Jennifer M. ;
Cadarette, Suzanne M. ;
Arnold, Marilyn ;
Katz, Jeffrey N. ;
Finkelstein, Joel S. ;
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Canning, Claire ;
Avorn, Jerry ;
Solomon, Daniel H. .
INTERNATIONAL QUARTERLY OF COMMUNITY HEALTH EDUCATION, 2009, 29 (03) :223-240