Assessment of the non-hydrostatic effect on the upper atmosphere using a general circulation model (GCM)

被引:78
作者
Deng, Yue [1 ]
Richmond, Arthur D. [1 ]
Ridley, Aaron J. [2 ]
Liu, Han-Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, High Altitude Observ, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Space Environm Modeling, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007GL032182
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Under hydrostatic equilibrium, a typical assumption used in global thermosphere ionosphere models, the pressure gradient in the vertical direction is exactly balanced by the gravity force. Using the non-hydrostatic Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (GITM), which solves the complete vertical momentum equation, the primary characteristics of non-hydrostatic effects on the upper atmosphere are investigated. Our results show that after a sudden intense enhancement of high-latitude Joule heating, the vertical pressure gradient force can locally be 25% larger than the gravity force, resulting in a significant disturbance away from hydrostatic equilibrium. This disturbance is transported from the lower altitude source region to high altitudes through an acoustic wave, which has been simulated in a global circulation model for the first time. Due to the conservation of perturbation energy, the magnitude of the vertical wind perturbation increases with altitude and reaches 150 ( 250) m/s at 300 ( 430) km during the disturbance. The upward neutral wind lifts the atmosphere and raises the neutral density at high altitudes by more than 100%. These large vertical winds are not typically reproduced by hydrostatic models of the thermosphere and ionosphere. Our results give an explanation of the cause of such strong vertical winds reported in many observations.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   First direct evidence of meso-scale variability on ion-neutral dynamics using co-located tristatic FPIs and EISCAT radar in Northern Scandinavia [J].
Aruliah, AL ;
Griffin, EM ;
Aylward, AD ;
Ford, EAK ;
Kosch, MJ ;
Davis, CJ ;
Howells, VSC ;
Pryse, SE ;
Middleton, HR ;
Jussila, J .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2005, 23 (01) :147-162
[2]   Possible reasons for underestimating Joule heating in global models:: E field variability, spatial resolution, and vertical velocity [J].
Deng, Yue ;
Ridley, Aaron J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2007, 112 (A9)
[3]   A 3-DIMENSIONAL GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL OF THE THERMOSPHERE [J].
DICKINSON, RE ;
RIDLEY, EC ;
ROBLE, RG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1981, 86 (NA3) :1499-1512
[4]  
FULLERROWELL TJ, 1980, J ATMOS SCI, V37, P2545, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2545:ATDTDG>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   DISCUSSION OF IONIZATION EFFECTS ON PROPAGATION OF ACOUSTIC-GRAVITY WAVES IN IONOSPHERE [J].
HINES, CO ;
HOOKE, WH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1970, 75 (13) :2563-&
[7]   Characterization of acoustic-gravity waves in the upper thermosphere using Dynamics Explorer 2 Wind and Temperature Spectrometer (WATS) and Neutral Atmosphere Composition Spectrometer (NACS) data [J].
Innis, JL ;
Conde, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2002, 107 (A12)
[8]  
PFEFFER RL, 1962, J ATMOS SCI, V19, P256, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1962)019<0256:AGWPFN>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   VISCOUS DAMPING OF ATMOSPHERIC GRAVITY WAVES [J].
PITTEWAY, ML ;
HINES, CO .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1963, 41 (12) :1935-&