Monitoring and Predicting the Surface Generation and Surface Roughness in Ultraprecision Machining: A Critical Review

被引:34
作者
Manjunath, K. [1 ,2 ]
Tewary, Suman [1 ,2 ]
Khatri, Neha [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Kai [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIR Cent Sci Instruments Org, Chandigarh 160030, India
[2] Acad Sci Innovat Res AcSIR, Ghaziabad 201002, India
[3] Brunel Univ London, Coll Engn Design & Phys Sci, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
关键词
ultraprecision machining; surface roughness; in-process monitoring; surface prediction; cutting forces modelling; micro cutting; WAVELET PACKET TRANSFORM; NEURAL-NETWORK; TOOL WEAR; DIMENSIONAL DEVIATION; CUTTING PARAMETERS; FEED RATE; VIBRATION; SIGNALS; FINISH; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/machines9120369
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The aim of manufacturing can be described as achieving the predefined high quality product in a short delivery time and at a competitive cost. However, it is unfortunately quite challenging and often difficult to ensure that certain quality characteristics of the products are met following the contemporary manufacturing paradigm, such as surface roughness, surface texture, and topographical requirements. Ultraprecision machining (UPM) requirements are quite common and essential for products and components with optical finishing, including larger and highly accurate mirrors, infrared optics, laser devices, varifocal lenses, and other freeform optics that can satisfy the technical specifications of precision optical components and devices without further post-polishing. Ultraprecision machining can provide high precision, complex components and devices with a nanometric level of surface finishing. Nevertheless, the process requires an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the machining system, such as diamond turning with various input parameters, tool features that are able to alter the machining efficiency, the machine working environment and conditions, and even workpiece and tooling materials. The non-linear and complex nature of the UPM process poses a major challenge for the prediction of surface generation and finishing. Recent advances in Industry 4.0 and machine learning are providing an effective means for the optimization of process parameters, particularly through in-process monitoring and prediction while avoiding the conventional trial-and-error approach. This paper attempts to provide a comprehensive and critical review on state-of-the-art in-surfaces monitoring and prediction in UPM processes, as well as a discussion and exploration on the future research in the field through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digital solutions for harnessing the practical UPM issues in the process, particularly in real-time. In the paper, the implementation and application perspectives are also presented, particularly focusing on future industrial-scale applications with the aid of advanced in-process monitoring and prediction models, algorithms, and digital-enabling technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   Evaluation of Clustering Techniques to Predict Surface Roughness during Turning of Stainless-Steel Using Vibration Signals [J].
Abu-Mahfouz, Issam ;
Banerjee, Amit ;
Rahman, Esfakur .
MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (17)
[2]   Surface roughness prediction as a classification problem using support vector machine [J].
Abu-Mahfouz, Issam ;
El Ariss, Omar ;
Rahman, A. H. M. Esfakur ;
Banerjee, Amit .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 92 (1-4) :803-815
[3]  
Adesta E. Y. T., 2012, ADV MAT RES, V576, P99
[4]   Artificial intelligence/machine learning in manufacturing and inspection: A GE perspective [J].
Aggour, Kareem S. ;
Gupta, Vipul K. ;
Ruscitto, Daniel ;
Ajdelsztajn, Leonardo ;
Bian, Xiao ;
Brosnan, Kristen H. ;
Kumar, Natarajan Chennimalai ;
Dheeradhada, Voramon ;
Hanlon, Timothy ;
Iyer, Naresh ;
Karandikar, Jaydeep ;
Li, Peng ;
Moitra, Abha ;
Reimann, Johan ;
Robinson, Dean M. ;
Santamaria-Pang, Alberto ;
Shen, Chen ;
Soare, Monica A. ;
Sun, Changjie ;
Suzuki, Akane ;
Venkataramana, Raju ;
Vinciguerra, Joseph .
MRS BULLETIN, 2019, 44 (07) :545-558
[5]   Modeling of Surface Roughness in Turning Operation Using Extreme Learning Machine [J].
Ahmad, Nooraziah ;
Janahiraman, Tiagrajah V. ;
Tarlochan, Faris .
ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 40 (02) :595-602
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS OKLAHOMA STAT
[7]   Prediction of surface roughness and cutting zone temperature in dry turning processes of AISI304 stainless steel using ANFIS with PSO learning [J].
Aydin, Mehmet ;
Karakuzu, Cihan ;
Ucar, Mehmet ;
Cengiz, Abdulkadir ;
Cavuslu, Mehmet Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (1-4) :957-967
[8]   On-line prediction of surface finish and dimensional deviation in turning using neural network based sensor fusion [J].
Azouzi, R ;
Guillot, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 1997, 37 (09) :1201-1217
[9]   Surface Roughness Prediction using Artificial Neural Network in Hard Turning of AISI H13 Steel with Minimal Cutting Fluid Application [J].
Beatrice, B. Anuja ;
Kirubakaran, E. ;
Thangaiah, P. Ranjit Jeba ;
Wins, K. Leo Dev .
12TH GLOBAL CONGRESS ON MANUFACTURING AND MANAGEMENT (GCMM - 2014), 2014, 97 :205-211
[10]   Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review [J].
Benardos, PG ;
Vosniakos, GC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2003, 43 (08) :833-844